E-Book Readers
-
Birdfeeding
Today is partly sunny and delightfully mild. I fed the birds. I've seen a small flock of house finches and a few sparrows. I walked around the yard…
-
Fieldhaven as Habitat
If you follow my posts on gardening, birdfeeding, and photos, then you know that I garden for wildlife. Looking at the YardMap parameters, here…
-
A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap
Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…
December 14 2009, 06:10:41 UTC 11 years ago
Um, no. Why would I? If I have a physical book, then I have the book; I have no need to purchase it again. I have and love a Kindle, and as an expat who travels a *lot* and the majority of whose books have been in storage for three years now, I probably depend on my Kindle more than almost anyone you'll meet. And yet, the only cases in which I've bought a digital copy of a book I already owned, are the same sort of case in which you might buy a second physical copy. Example: I bought a second (physical) copy of Howl's Moving Castle and the third Chrestomanci collection because I'd made a bad choice about what to leave behind and I couldn't bear to be parted from it any longer; I'd have gotten those on Kindle if they'd been available. I bought e-copies of the Paksenarrion books and His Majesty's Dragon because I missed my copies and I saw those for free or cheap; I bought an e-copy of Jane Austen's works because my physical copy (also of all of her books together) is very large and I wanted a more portable one.
But I don't ever expect to live in a house not lined with books. The hundreds I already have would prevent that (about 1700 at last check) even if I didn't keep buying more - when they're not available in electronic format.
Well...
December 14 2009, 07:15:10 UTC 11 years ago
I have to admit, when I looked at the storage capacity on one reader, I laughed. I think it was like 200 books. That's not a library. I probably have more cookbooks than that.
Re: Well...
December 14 2009, 08:03:13 UTC 11 years ago
Re: Well...
December 14 2009, 18:06:44 UTC 11 years ago
I love Amazon's idea of making it possible to buy books anywhere, anytime as long as there is a wireless connection. That would make my research much easier.
I do like the idea of being able to store some books compactly.
But I completely refuse to have a collection that someone else can rob at their pleasure; Amazon killed my interest with that stunt. I'm not impressed by the slow function rate, barely legible displays, and clunky handling of any ebook reader I've seen; and the battery life is laughably pathetic compared to the many hours I spend reading. Those are technical concerns that will probably be solved. I'd want a reader that could store some books for current use, with an offloadable library that could be kept on secure hard storage elsewhere to prevent data loss.
So far, paper books tremendously outperform ebooks for me personally. I'll keep an eye on ebook readers to see if they move closer to my usability range, though.