I think this is pretty important and have been thinking about it for a day, particularly in the context of how we like to talk about "cutting off" people who are "dragging us down." I understand that carrying lonely, annoying, spiky or poorly-socialized people is a burden, but it's always felt important to me to try. Here's science saying, "It is important, and we have a tendency not to."
This is one of many ways in which the social fabric is fraying. There's another feedback loop not mentioned in the article, however. It used to be that society rewarded and supported people who "carried" others. Now that happens less and less. So the people who do this work tend to get used up in the process. It becomes a self-destructive habit, because not enough people take care of the ones who do it. When nobody's helping you carry a load, you can either let it crush you -- or lighten the load. Most people lighten the load. The ones who get crushed become an object lesson to everyone else, so that this is taught not as a virtue but as a vice. There are then fewer and fewer people available to do this kind of work.
Furthermore, it's very difficult to do this sort of work "in moderation," because damaged people can be extremely clingy around their last few friends. About the closest you can come is working with just one lonely person at a time. You still need to have the extra time and energy to deal with someone else's problems in addition to your own responsibilities and issues, because if you don't have extra, then you not only exhaust yourself, you also let down the healthy people who are depending on you to fill your social role in ways you can't if you've spent yourself out propping up someone broken.
That leads to another aspect of this collective mess: fault tolerance. That's a system's ability to absorb shocks, drains, or damage without losing function. We've built a society with almost no fault tolerance; we're running near, at, or beyond maximum safe limits on most things most of the time. So every bump and joggle and setback tends to be felt keenly. There is rarely any kind of extra capacity or safety margin to compensate for inevitable challenges. That means more people get hit hard enough to sustain real personality damage because they're closer to the wall, that fewer people are available to help them recover before the damage becomes irreversible, and that there's unlikely to be much if any backup for the people who might try to help them, so that if a helper goes down even for a little while that causes hardship for someone else who relies on the helper.
Now bring in the money aspect. Loneliness is getting worse because we've discarded many long-term bonds of extended family, church congregation, secure employment, etc. -- so society responded in the classic capitalist way, paying people to do the work. We've thrown more of this burden onto counselors, social workers, and other professionals. Unfortunately, they tend not to get called in until the situation is already a total disaster; and their services are unaffordable hence unavailable to many people. That throws the burden back on a person's friends and family, if any. So the subsystem we devised to deal with the gap doesn't actually work very well. And what's worse? Almost all the "helping" professions routinely function beyond safe capacity. This loops right back to burnout, which is where we started.
It's not a vicious circle. It's a vicious tesseract. Every piece of it connects to the others and makes the problem worse.
So, how do we address this problem without causing more damage to ourselves or somewhere else?
1) The article mentioned one excellent approach: catch problems early before they get really bad and really hard to fix. It's better to prevent someone from drifting to the edge of the social web than it is to haul them back after they get that far out.
2) A huge help would be to restore our support of people who are doing the hard work of sustaining others. Do you know somebody who does pastoral counseling or marriage counseling or community outreach or is otherwise acting as a social grease trap? Try doing something nice for them. Take them out to dinner. Wash their car. Pick up the slack if their work makes them temporarily unavailable. And tell them you appreciate what they're doing. This sort of thing is much easier to do in moderation, but it helps make more people available for social support over a longer time.
3) Practice and teach social skills. People who grow up in subfunctional families often don't learn everything they need. Sometimes friends can help fill in the gaps. Especially listen for people saying, "I don't know how to..." or citing bad examples from their background. Those are good openings for more positive examples: "One way to do that is..." or "In my family, when this happens, we..."
4) Use the tools you have. In this context, cyberspace can be tremendously useful. It's not a substitute for facetime socializing, but it can keep people connected in circumstances where facetime socializing is difficult or impossible. It's also a terrific addition to more conventional activities. I know lots of folks who use LJ to keep in touch with other people, lighten depression, or rustle up social support. You can socialize freestyle or look for helpful memes; this is part of my inspiration for the "Hard Things" and "Plans and Goals" memes in my LJ, which are visible under the "community" tag.
5) Build the biggest, strongest social network that you can. Spread it across multiple layers of family, employment, spirituality, locale, whatever works for you. Encourage people to connect with each other. Do things to create and strengthen connections -- celebrate life's milestones, gather for holidays, send cards or gifts, plan activities together, etc. Share news. The better the network, the more likely people will be there for each other in times of need.
When challenges arise, do one thing yourself and then pass the word: "John's car broke down. I drove him home; he'll need someone to run him to the grocery store tomorrow." Depending on how well you know your listener (and how well they know the victim), you might throw in an extra phrase such as, "What about you?" or "Do you know anyone who could help?" or "What are you doing?" There's a delicate balance between inviting people to take part in a social network, and pestering them. But the hinting can be really helpful to folks who want to take part but don't know how because they've never belonged to a functional group before.
Don't try to do everything yourself; that way lies burnout. Instead, try to spread out the burden across multiple people so that it doesn't cause serious hardship for anyone.
What are some ways that you use to create and support social connections in your life?
← Ctrl ← Alt
Ctrl → Alt →
December 3 2009, 18:05:01 UTC 11 years ago
Good for you!
December 3 2009, 18:21:37 UTC 11 years ago
December 3 2009, 18:19:37 UTC 11 years ago
I am fortunate have a wonderful support structure, one that I've spent the years of this relationship serving because now that I had security, I could spend the time and energy to do. Now that it has come to a crashing halt, I have to depend on it rather than serve it. It has been and will be very interesting to see who steps up and who backs off.
Thoughts
December 3 2009, 18:26:27 UTC 11 years ago
*hugs available if desired*
>>in the process of being "discarded" after just 2 years of marriage and 5 years of living together before that.<<
How awful! I think that many marriages fail because people don't have the skills and understanding needed to keep them going. It's very sad.
>> It's like being suddenly fired from a job while still being told, "you're lovely, wonderful, brilliant, great, you deserve better..but you're fired" for no good reason that anyone can fathom.<<
Sometimes the person just doesn't want to talk about their real complaints. Other times, the problem is internal to them. But none of that makes the situation less miserable.
>>I am fortunate have a wonderful support structure, one that I've spent the years of this relationship serving because now that I had security, I could spend the time and energy to do.<<
That's a good thing.
>>Now that it has come to a crashing halt, I have to depend on it rather than serve it. It has been and will be very interesting to see who steps up and who backs off.<<
It will certainly reveal who your real friends are.
11 years ago
11 years ago
Thoughts
11 years ago
Re: Thoughts
11 years ago
Re: Thoughts
11 years ago
Re: Thoughts
11 years ago
11 years ago
11 years ago
December 3 2009, 18:53:24 UTC 11 years ago
*bask, preen*
December 3 2009, 19:13:20 UTC 11 years ago
This is my way of trying to make the world a better place, the kind of place I would enjoy living. I try to find ways of showing people things that are important which they might not notice on their own. Some days I have more energy for it than others. But the teaching and the information-sharing and the writing are part of me; this is my role in community.
Re: *bask, preen*
11 years ago
Deleted comment
Yes...
December 3 2009, 19:20:12 UTC 11 years ago
That's one of the things for which I have little or no tolerance. If someone is honestly trying to work on their problems, I will give them a lot of leeway, even if they're doing more flailing around than making progress. But if they abdicate responsibility and refuse to make any attempt to improve matters, I shoo them away. That's just not the kind of thing I can help with; I'm a problem-solver and an insight mirror. However...
>>I think it comes down to realizing when giving support to someone has crossed the line into overdependance/co-dependance, emotional vampirism, etc...<<
... there is also a need for people who can deal with individuals so broken that they are unable to respond appropriately.
A key factor in community support is understanding what your skills are, so that you can pick appropriate people to help where those skills will do some good. Other folks you may need to direct to someone else. It's also really good to have an idea what other people's strengths are. If somebody needs a good listener, and you're more of a problem-solver, then you should point them to someone else who is a good listener.
11 years ago
Hmm...
11 years ago
Re: Hmm...
11 years ago
Re: Hmm...
Anonymous
11 years ago
Re: Hmm...
11 years ago
Re: Hmm...
Anonymous
11 years ago
Deleted comment
Hmm...
11 years ago
Deleted comment
Re: Hmm...
11 years ago
December 3 2009, 19:21:55 UTC 11 years ago
*bow, flourish*
December 3 2009, 19:23:51 UTC 11 years ago
Re: *bow, flourish*
11 years ago
Re: *bow, flourish*
11 years ago
December 3 2009, 19:53:58 UTC 11 years ago
I think all the points made here are excellent ones. In fact, they're reflected very strongly in the book I'm reading right now, the Carter Family biography Will You Miss Me When I'm Gone which shows the small-town structure and support systems that persisted in rural Appalachia into the early part of the last century.
On a more personal note, I'm the child of a grief/pastoral counselor and I find myself falling into a lot of the support roles portrayed here. It's natural, because I grew up watching it happen.
I am frequently encouraged by friends and loved ones to 'give up' on someone who seems to be a hopeless case. While the temptation is sometimes there, I find that the best solution is frequently just to be honest with a person who's being too needy. Saying no to them doesn't mean cutting them off, but it does mean retaining your own sanity and resources. Sometimes it does have to be a very forceful 'no', but I often find myself taking a tough-love stance with these situations, and frequently it has caused the person in question to re-evaluate just what or how much it is that they're asking for.
I would say though that the one place where I do back off and make it clear to the person that they need to not contact me is in a case where their dependence includes a one-sided element of physical attraction. For me there's a major divide between 'being there for a friend' and being the target of unwanted attention.
Yes, please!
December 3 2009, 21:15:01 UTC 11 years ago
By all means, share it with anyone you think would benefit.
>>On a more personal note, I'm the child of a grief/pastoral counselor and I find myself falling into a lot of the support roles portrayed here. It's natural, because I grew up watching it happen.<<
That's wonderful.
>>I am frequently encouraged by friends and loved ones to 'give up' on someone who seems to be a hopeless case. <<
One thing I've noticed is that some of the folks I know have terrible histories; five or ten years back, they would've been "hopeless cases." Sometimes people do come out of it.
>>While the temptation is sometimes there, I find that the best solution is frequently just to be honest with a person who's being too needy. Saying no to them doesn't mean cutting them off, but it does mean retaining your own sanity and resources.<<
Yes, that's a good approach.
>>I would say though that the one place where I do back off and make it clear to the person that they need to not contact me is in a case where their dependence includes a one-sided element of physical attraction.<<
That's a place where a lot of people draw the line. Others are just so used to it that it doesn't bother them, they can deal.
Anonymous
11 years ago
Hmm...
11 years ago
Re: Hmm...
Anonymous
11 years ago
Re: Hmm...
Anonymous
11 years ago
Re: Hmm...
11 years ago
Deleted comment
Good point!
December 3 2009, 21:07:06 UTC 11 years ago
Anonymous
December 3 2009, 22:52:10 UTC 11 years ago
Just on the emotional/listening sort of thing, I used to hang out with some monks and gurus, and what they did was to say the right things and give the right body language -- without taking on the emotional burdens themselves. They said they were helping the victim connect with his own spiritual source, rather than giving him a transfusion.
December 3 2009, 22:58:59 UTC 11 years ago
1) According to structural functionalism, religion, as an analogous organ in the human body, serves as the endocrine system for the cultural body. It usually motivates a culture in the direction it needs to go to maintain itself. That ranges for preparing for fight-or-flight to mitigating suffering. It seems to me, though, that Western society's endocrine system is a rather sickly organ.
2) A section of the front line troops in trying to help others socialize are our educators. They're key in helping our young ones learn how to socialize and monitor for any rising problems. Believe me, they can use all the support they can get, too.
Yes...
December 3 2009, 23:12:20 UTC 11 years ago
Our buffering capacity seems to be diminishing, yes.
>>A section of the front line troops in trying to help others socialize are our educators.<<
Which they can't do if they are required to spend a majority of their time serving as test adminstrators, and if the student:teacher ratio is too high.
Re: Yes...
11 years ago
Re: Yes...
11 years ago
December 3 2009, 23:24:19 UTC 11 years ago
I am NOT willing to become the target for a bunch of helpless leeches where the connection is perpetual and only goes one way. That is not the path to a happy and fulfilling life, it is the path to a miserable and draining one. This article is based on the fundamental premise that it is the duty of those who are able to subsidize those who are not, and I take no part in it.
I completely agree that friendships and social networks are important. I completely agree that you should keep up with friends even when it feels inconvenient sometimes. I agree, not on a premise of noble self-sacrifice for my friend, but on the premise that just because it may feel like a pain sometimes to keep up a friendship, doesn't mean I don't want that person in my life at all. But I expect to GET something out of my friendships and networks as well as GIVE, and I pick them accordingly.
I am not your keeper. Don't tread on me.
December 4 2009, 01:01:33 UTC 11 years ago
You know where we are?
The freaking City of Ember! That's where we are!
O_O
December 4 2009, 01:08:06 UTC 11 years ago
Re: O_O
11 years ago
Re: O_O
11 years ago
Re: O_O
11 years ago
Re: O_O
11 years ago
December 4 2009, 05:11:18 UTC 11 years ago
I have had people who were so codependent that they were just using me - they were the people who didn't want to solve their problems, they just wanted to say "yes, but..." to any suggestion I had, and keep sucking money and emotional resources from me. Sorry, no, I'm not into feeding drama queens and "poor little me"s.
I encourage other people to take in the onesies, the people with no family, no partners. In the fandom community these people are there, and they often don't say much, but need the extra help from people they are comfortable with, not some random stranger.
We've allowed the corporate wage slave mentality to divide us up into individual units of desperation and loneliness. We don't have to live in each other's laps to have connection, and help solve each other's problems.
Thoughts
December 4 2009, 05:19:59 UTC 11 years ago
Oh bright gods YES, the drama queens! A couple of those have come through our community. You have to keep an eye on how much they're taking from other people, not just yourself -- particularly unconsenting bystanders. It's no fun to go to a party or a ritual or a meeting and get beaned by someone else's Stuff. Groups have been destroyed by that.
>>I encourage other people to take in the onesies, the people with no family, no partners. In the fandom community these people are there, and they often don't say much, but need the extra help from people they are comfortable with, not some random stranger.<<
That's a really good point, too. I do tend to pay extra attention to people who are adrift without a support network. When possible I try to weave them in so they'll have connections with multiple people.
>>We've allowed the corporate wage slave mentality to divide us up into individual units of desperation and loneliness. We don't have to live in each other's laps to have connection, and help solve each other's problems.<<
Too true.
Anonymous
December 4 2009, 06:23:32 UTC 11 years ago
December 4 2009, 07:34:53 UTC 11 years ago
Trouble is, these are all aimed at people like you who know what they're doing, and using it to help people who don't. I'm one of those people who never learned what I needed; I'm trying to learn it now, and I'm finding it tough going. Especially now that I'm also trying to help people.
Somehow I seem to have been thrown into that role, totally without preparation. I muddle through, but it's been touch-and-go some times. I'm very much out of my depth, and making things up as I go along.
Anonymous
December 4 2009, 08:07:02 UTC 11 years ago
Well, but you can do that. Help them in little practical ways.
/houseboat/
11 years ago
Thoughts
11 years ago
December 5 2009, 02:05:58 UTC 11 years ago
Introverts like me have an extra layer of difficulty with this sort of thing, as does anyone with a disability or mental illness. Friendships and support networks can be really hard to build and maintain if social contact itself makes you uncomfortable or nervous, and if you are periodically (or perpetually) needy. Or if you are the sort of person who is only comfortable having a couple of close friendships.
I'm not asking you to cover this stuff, just saying that this is a really useful start that I would love to see expanded. I will think on it, and maybe I can write something about building friendships if you're an introvert.
Thoughts
December 5 2009, 02:51:42 UTC 11 years ago
*bow, flourish* Happy to be of service.
>>Introverts like me have an extra layer of difficulty with this sort of thing, as does anyone with a disability or mental illness.<<
That can be true, although introversion unto itself is not necessarily something wrong. It's only a problem if it prevents you from doing things you want and need to to or it's generally making you miserable.
>>Or if you are the sort of person who is only comfortable having a couple of close friendships.<<
A possible solution to that is to make at least one of those a "hub" person who knows lots of other people. If you suddenly need way more of a network, your hub friend can help hook you up with other folks temporarily.
>>I'm not asking you to cover this stuff, just saying that this is a really useful start that I would love to see expanded.<<
I have some more ideas, so I think I'll spin out another post.
>> I will think on it, and maybe I can write something about building friendships if you're an introvert.<<
I'd love to see this too. Please post a comment with the link if you do that.
Re: Thoughts
11 years ago
Re: Thoughts
11 years ago
← Ctrl ← Alt
Ctrl → Alt →