It’s the gold standard, stupid
The federal government now serves as pusher/dealer for the nation’s drug of choice: money. We’re all addicted to it. Alcohol, pills and illegal substances pale by comparison.</p>We kept mainlining money after World War II, the war that pulled us out of the long Great Depression (not, as the liberal litany claims, President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s alphabet soup agencies and deficit spending). Now we’re going through withdrawal pains.
It makes no sense for the pusher/dealer also to serve as doctor in fighting this addiction, but to steal a tagline from the late Walter Cronkite: “That’s the way it is.”
It Runs in the Family...
-
Physics Staircase
I am familiar with many of those upper steps! :D There is no end to knowledge and discovery. It has mountains upon mountains.
-
Bowling Ball and Feathers
... in case you want to see an ancient science experiment done now that we have the proper equipment.
-
Notes for "An Elusive, Tantalizing Partner"
These are the notes for " An Elusive, Tantalizing Partner." "Science is like a love affair with nature; an elusive, tantalizing…
Thoughts
November 17 2009, 00:20:45 UTC 11 years ago
Agreed.
>>I'm just not sure gold is the right or only choice- plus, I think it'd have really nasty consequences for those of us for whom gold is a medium, not a commodity- AND for everyone who, say, wants wedding rings by extension. I do grant that's a very personal and fairly irrelevant perspective in the greater scheme of things.<<
Gold is not the only choice, just a popular one. A key drawback to material-backed economies is that people tend to tear up the Earth in search of whatever the commodity is.
I'd want a system, ideally, that would instead encourage people to take care of the Earth. *ponder* Maybe not a straight commodity exchange, but rather basing the amount of funds on some combination of environmental resources such as clean air, fresh water, old-growth forest, etc. -- in a way such that destroying those resources deletes the money-credit they supported. There has been talk about giving some kind of resources to third-world nations if they would just leave their rainforests standing as oxygen farms.
Re: Thoughts
November 17 2009, 01:12:03 UTC 11 years ago
I agree that a standard that's based on STUFF- or, maybe, hours of labor- would be better than the current; I just don't know enough to have much of an opinion about how to manage it.
I will certainly be keen on any future posts about this- and thanks again!
Re: Thoughts
November 17 2009, 02:01:51 UTC 11 years ago
http://www.arlingtoninstitute.org/alternative-currency-overview