After you divorce someone, the government can seize YOUR assets for FIVE YEARS to pay your ex-spouse's medical bills.
This is because they know that people sometimes divorce to avoid paying medical bills they can't afford. So for those of you who want to avoid situations in which the government can take your money against your will to pay for someone else's medical bills: that is already happening. This clearly demonstrates, in a "by their deeds you shall know them" way, that America does not really have "family values" but in fact values money above all else; the society is happy to destroy families and individual lives to get at money it thinks it deserves to take away from people. I am most vehemently against this abomination of a law, so if anyone has links to a protest against it, please let me know.
Until Medical Bills Do Us Part
Critics fret that health care reform would undermine American family values, not least by convening somber death panels to wheel away Grandma as if she were Old Yeller.</span></span>
But peel away the emotions and fearmongering, and in fact it is the existing system that unnecessarily takes lives and breaks apart families.
Also worth noting is the number of preventable deaths caused by flaws in the current health care system: about 18,000 per year. The official death toll of the 9/11/2001 attack was 2,993 and America went absolutely bear-sark as a result. But we quietly murder about 9 times that many of our own citizens every year. I consider it murder because those deaths are preventable and are deliberately caused by the choices of other persons. So, about every half an hour someone dies because in America, you only have a right to life if you have the money to pay for it.
America today is an ugly country. I wish it were more civilized. I wish it were a safe and healthy place for everyone to live. I wish it supported family life for real, instead of lying that it supports family values while engaging in multiple acts that tear apart families of various kinds.
Deleted comment
Well...
August 31 2009, 19:36:47 UTC 11 years ago
Deleted comment
Re: Well...
August 31 2009, 20:28:02 UTC 11 years ago
As a species, I think, and certainly as a society, we're conditioned to respond to "SHINY!"
Re: Well...
August 31 2009, 21:11:16 UTC 11 years ago
Re: Well...
August 31 2009, 20:49:33 UTC 11 years ago
It's about who deserves to be treated. We're immersed in a culture that confuses wealth with virtue and poverty (or victimization) with vice. <<
That is significantly true.
I believe that everyone deserves to have the health care that they need. I believe that wealth is a very foolish way to assess the value of a human being.
Re: Well...
August 31 2009, 20:58:34 UTC 11 years ago
Put a REAL face on healthcare, and see what people say.
Re: Well...
11 years ago
Re: Well...
11 years ago
Deleted comment
Re: Well...
11 years ago
Deleted comment
Re: Well...
11 years ago
August 31 2009, 23:06:31 UTC 11 years ago
Actually, we do a lot. To pick one, NHTSB / DOT does quite a lot, from mandatory automobile safety standards, to improvements in road and highway design, crashworthy vehicle designs, air bags, national standards for emergency care and EMT/paramedic training, and so on.
We also spend an awful lot of money on freeway and roadway design, arguably in very inefficient ways but the purported goal is improved safety. A single flyover overpass (CA 152 to CA 156) was justified in terms of lives saved, and cost almost $35 million dollars.
http://www.vta.org/projects/152_156_improv_project/SR152_fact.pdf
One of the more dramatic and less cost-effective methods of improving survival after high speed collisions is the helicopter ambulance, which takes critically injured victims to advanced medical facilities within one hour of injury. If we simply let these multiple trauma victims die, we could save $25K to $50K in direct costs per incident plus all the medical, surgical, and rehabilitation costs which can surge into the hundreds of thousands per patient.
It's simply that people persist in distracted driving (main factor in one-third of fatal collisions), driving drunk (50% of road fatalities involve alcohol), and excessive speed which increases the severity and lethality of collisions.
See also http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/26/2627.asp and http://www.madd.org/
Deleted comment
Hmm...
September 1 2009, 04:30:39 UTC 11 years ago
America has spent the last 50-100 years or so designing itself to require people to drive cars. The cities are sprawled so badly that it will take years of concerted effort to reorganize them so that employment, goods and services, and housing are all withing walking or biking distance again. Plus the country is huge; many people live in rural areas where they must have cars because there is no public transportation. We can't just cut down radically on car use; it will take a long time to work in that direction.
I would like to see less car use. It's just not going to be quick or easy.
September 1 2009, 19:41:19 UTC 11 years ago
Wow!
September 1 2009, 02:21:27 UTC 11 years ago
September 1 2009, 13:00:50 UTC 11 years ago
Thoughts
September 1 2009, 16:40:32 UTC 11 years ago
Re: Thoughts
September 2 2009, 03:11:08 UTC 11 years ago