One of them gave me a shout-out today for a comment I left. We're talking about how and why the treatment of mental complaints lags behind that of physical complaints, and it started with a previous discussion about whether and why drugs can be helpful.
Basically, I have noticed certain patterns in dealing with friends who have mental challenges, and that has built up a little basket of ideas on the topic. Sometimes when an opportunity arises, I set one of them out. One of these days I need to flesh these out and present them in full. You can see bits of several here: different solutions work for different people because there are many different causes of mental complaints, and there's a difference between mental illness and mental </i> injury, and we just don't have ways of perceiving exactly what needs to be fixed let alone the ability to reach in and repair it. So we ... muddle.
August 10 2009, 17:27:58 UTC 11 years ago
Most of all mental illness is short term, people have an illness, they get better and are no more likely to suffer that same illness again than the rest of the population. Often less likely because recognising possible triggers they can take early preventative action.
Hmm...
August 10 2009, 17:50:46 UTC 11 years ago
I wonder if the odd tendency to stimatize mental complaints is related to the Christian tendency to view body and soul as separate -- with body being inherently flawed, and soul supposed to be pure and eternal. That is, people expect bodies to be subject to flaws and failures; they don't expect that of souls and are upset when it happens. Because the soul is supposed to be guided by morals, any flaws in the soul are seen as failures of morality, whether they really are or not.
Re: Hmm...
August 10 2009, 18:11:14 UTC 11 years ago
I'm mentally ill - I have bipolar disorder, and fairly severe at that. What my experience tells me is that to a great extent, I can tell when it's me speaking or when it's the illness that's speaking (so to speak). And what treatment does, at least for me, is it quells the illness so that it's me that's speaking more of the time. What people seem not to realize is that this demarcation does exist, and that mental illness does not define the person as a whole, which is where a lot of the stigma comes from.
Raven
Re: Hmm...
August 10 2009, 19:10:29 UTC 11 years ago
I was amazed to learn last year that I have also learned to tell the difference between "this major depressive episode is based in my mind and needs to see a counselor" and "this major depressive episode is based in my brain and needs new drugs".
Re: Hmm...
August 10 2009, 21:29:21 UTC 11 years ago
Re: Hmm...
August 11 2009, 14:13:07 UTC 11 years ago
Re: Hmm...
August 10 2009, 21:01:06 UTC 11 years ago
The demarcation is real, and people do tend to ignore it.
However, they do that with physical handicaps too, creating a major challenge for disabled people; and health care professionals do it with physical injuries and illnesses in general.
Re: Hmm...
August 10 2009, 21:11:31 UTC 11 years ago
Regarding the first half of this statement, your point is well taken. Regarding the second half, frankly, I don't know about the health care that you've received, but my experience is different, at least at present. Not only do I have bipolar disorder, but I'm also diabetic and a cancer survivor, and at the facility at which I am treated, I've never gotten that impression. So it's not really safe to make that generalization.
Raven
Re: Hmm...
August 10 2009, 22:04:04 UTC 11 years ago
Let's say that it has very rarely been to my satisfaction.
>>So it's not really safe to make that generalization.<<
It's not universal, but it is widespread -- most often expressed through things like "that heart attack in room 301 is waiting for you." I've heard this in many different establishments and read about it in multiple sources. One explanation suggested in some linguistic texts is that many health care workers find that they have to do something to dehumanize the clients so that they can stand to be around suffering people without melting down themselves. It's a defense mechanism, and it has its uses. But one of the drawbacks is that it can make health care workers very hard to talk to.
You are very lucky never to have encountered this.
Re: Hmm...
August 12 2009, 14:02:36 UTC 11 years ago
I'm sorry to hear that. However, I suspect that your experience is closer to the norm than my current one. I should probably emphasize that I've fired doctors that didn't meet with my standard.
It's not universal, but it is widespread -- most often expressed through things like "that heart attack in room 301 is waiting for you."
I did some (admittedly unscientific) checking on that, and the consensus was that on the one hand, that's correct, but on the other hand, it's something that there's a growing backlash against, which I think is a good thing.
You are very lucky never to have encountered this.
I didn't say "never" - it's my current standard of treatment. And as I indicated above, I've fired providers that didn't come up to my standard.
Raven
Re: Hmm...
August 13 2009, 04:15:51 UTC 11 years ago Edited: August 13 2009, 04:19:15 UTC
But it is so much easier to call it a "psychotic episode" and refuse to describe it further, than to explain what was really going on, because to a person without a comparable understanding of such matters, I might as well be speaking lunacy.