Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

Food, Fat People, and Society

My partner Doug pointed me at this interesting article discussing why Americans are getting fatter:

Why are we so fat?
In the early nineteen-nineties, a researcher at the C.D.C. named Katherine Flegal was reviewing the results of the survey then under way when she came across figures that seemed incredible. According to the first National Health study, which was done in the early nineteen-sixties, 24.3 per cent of American adults were overweight—roughly defined as having a body-mass index greater than twenty-seven. (The metrics are slightly different for men and women; by the study’s definition, a woman who is five feet tall would count as overweight if she was more than a hundred and forty pounds, and a man who is six feet tall if he weighed more than two hundred and four pounds.) By the time of the second survey, conducted in the early nineteen-seventies, the proportion of overweight adults had increased by three-quarters of a per cent, to twenty-five per cent, and, by the third survey, in the late seventies, it had edged up to 25.4 per cent. The results that Flegal found so surprising came from the fourth survey. During the nineteen-eighties, the American gut, instead of expanding very gradually, had ballooned: 33.3 per cent of adults now qualified as overweight. Flegal began asking around at professional meetings. Had other researchers noticed a change in Americans’ waistlines? They had not. This left her feeling even more perplexed. She knew that errors could have sneaked into the data in a variety of ways, so she and her colleagues checked and rechecked the figures. There was no problem that they could identify. Finally, in 1994, they published their findings in the Journal of the American Medical Association. In just ten years, they showed, Americans had collectively gained more than a billion pounds. “If this was about tuberculosis, it would be called an epidemic,” another researcher wrote in an editorial accompanying the report.


The article mentions various theories but doesn't really tie them all together. Americans are gaining weight rapidly due to a confluence of factors, including but not limited to:
1) Human evolution inclines people to like high-calorie foods. This used to be an asset in a food-poor environment but is turning deadly in a food-rich environment.
2) Some populations have a genetic predisposition to pack on fat, others less so.
3) Food quality isn't great right now, and people forget that if you eat empty calories, they aren't very satisfying and you wind up wanting more.
4) Portion sizes are growing, and people do tend to eat more if the portion is bigger.
5) Lifestyle pressure puts most people in sedentary jobs. They spend so much time working, little time or energy is left for physical activity. Technological advances mean less activity at work, such as using a scanner and printer on the desk instead of walking down the hall to a copy machine. Many people live in places with little opportunity for outdoor activity: lack of sidewalks, dangerous cities, etc.
6) Many drugs cause weight gain as a side effect, especially certain psychoactive drugs that are becoming extremely popular. More and more people are on drugs long-term and that adds up.
7) Companies are rewarded for making products that sell, not for making safe nourishing food. Consequently they focus on making as much money as possible by selling as much food as possible; if it fails to nourish people, or if it destroys their health, the companies only care if it's so traceable they can be sued (which costs them money). If it's endemic, they do not have to pay the price so they are free to harm people.

So basically, American culture makes it hard to do the right thing and easy to do the wrong thing. It's possible to eat a healthy diet and get enough exercise, but you have to go quite a bit out of your way to do that. Most people won't, and many simply don't have the resources even if they wanted to. Browbeating people will do absolutely nothing to solve this problem. The only way to fix it is to undo the damage we've done; that would take work and cost money, so people don't want to do it. All we have to do, and the only thing that will work, is to make it easy to do the right thing and hard to do the wrong thing.

Another consideration that the article muddied up one side and down the other is the issue over how society treats fat people. It is true that too much fat is hard on the body; statistically, heavier people are more likely to run into health problems and certain problems are exacerbated by weight gain. It is not true that being fat necessarily makes a person unhealthy; there are plenty of fat people who are healthy. It is also true that being too skinny is hard on the body, and America also manages to have severe problems in this direction. Eating disorders are widespread and growing. It doesn't help that the guidelines are often badly skewed in one direction or another, distorting perceptions of what a healthy weight range really is. And none of this addresses how people treat each other: fat people (or even non-scrawny people who are called fat or perceived as being fat) are often picked on, harassed, discriminated against, overcharged, or otherwise mistreated simply because of their size. That is unacceptable. Fat people are still people. It is not right to abuse someone just because you don't like the way they look, or live. Condemning an entire group is wrong. Condemning an individual is rude and risky -- you have no way of knowing whether someone is fat due to overeating, due to genetics or disease, due to prescriptions, or any other combination of factors.

Take responsibility for your own life and body. Do the best you can with what you have. Don't beat up on yourself if it's not perfect; don't pick on other people if they're not perfect. If you are displeased by your society's values or actions, do something about it. If you want to make a widespread social change, first analyze the problem using the best data you can find. Do not be distracted by emotions. Identify as many causes and variables as you can. Set aside the ones that can't readily be influenced. Then work on changing the ones that can be influenced. Don't stand by and watch society continue to do something stupid just because everybody's doing it. Fix what you can, and usually after a decade or few other folks will catch on.
Tags: food, networking, news
Subscribe

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 49 comments
They left out "a country wide rise in depression". I know first hand that depression can cause people to eat more, as food has a deceptive comfort. And while depression kills the appetite of some people, in other people it increases it.
That's a great point there, I am surprised they didn't mention depression.

Good Point

ysabetwordsmith

11 years ago

Re: Good Point

fayanora

11 years ago

Re: Good Point

fayanora

11 years ago

Re: Good Point

asakiyume

11 years ago

je_reviens

11 years ago

fayanora

11 years ago

Having recently been to the US, and having recently tried to eat a sensible, low-carb diet in the US, I no longer wonder why people are fat.

I know what I'm doing. And I had to fight very, very hard for it, and without access to an all-you-can-eat oriental buffet (actually, two, and I frequented them, after checking out alternatives, night after night) I don't think I would have managed.

Mmmmmh Mongolian BBQ, where you can heap loads of vegetables on your plate with only a little oil. Compared to European offerings of the same kind, there were more sweet dishes, and fewer herb/spice based ones, and WTF sugar water to pour over your BBQ??????)

The supermarket I could reach (no car - decent walking, though, (in Williamsburgh VA, and a workable bus system) had hideously expensive vegetables, good cuts of meat were expensive (I checked out of curiousity). The food that was cheap was also fattening. *Very* fattening.

But what really got me was that everything I looked at - cereal, ready meals, snacks, chocolate - was higher carb than its UK counterparts. Bite for bite of chocolate, an American will put on more weight and put himself at greater risk of diabetes.

And then the hotel buffet - milk and sweetened cereal (no plain cornflakes etc which are high-carb enough, no it had to be stuff with sugar and raisins and colouring in it), plus... no, not white toast which is all empty carbs anyway, sweet pastries with glazing and raisins. I'd been prepared for 'unhealthy' but hadn't been prepared for extra helping of sugar. I ended up buying myself a plain croissant for breakfast, which was two degrees more carb-loaded than I wanted, and *still* the healthy option. Ugh.

In America, it is extremely easy to eat an extremely unhealthy diet (all those super-cheap fast food offers, plus a seemingly ingrained habit to eat out for breakfast = more than once a day), difficult and expensive to eat a balanced diet, and almost inevitable to eat less healthilly than in Europe if you have the same eating/shopping/dining habits.

In the long run, that's something that *really* needs to be tackled. The next time I visit the United States, I want to go to a supermarket and marvel at the amount of interesting, tasty things on the shelves that I can't wait to try.

Oh, and I want my food GM free, as every evidence points to being allergic, so it's not just a philosophical stance, it's a very practical requirment.
I very much resent how expensive it is to eat healthily. It's not such a problem for us now, but it was ten years ago. It requires effort, interest, and determination to eat healthily, and those things can be hard to apply if you're exhausted and anxious, which can be the case if you're out of work or earning a very minimal amount.

Yes...

ysabetwordsmith

11 years ago

Re: Yes...

asakiyume

11 years ago

haikujaguar

11 years ago

green_knight

11 years ago

*laugh*

ysabetwordsmith

11 years ago

Hmm...

ysabetwordsmith

11 years ago

Thoughts

ysabetwordsmith

11 years ago

Yes, quality of food has gone down a ton since I was a little kid back in the 90s! It's sad how much it's gone down. Your advice is very credible and matter of fact, and a good solution to many different problems, and that's what I like about it. I also add that people could stand to be less closed-minded about varying body types. There's a stereotype that suggests all overweight people are unhealthy and make bad decisions. People can learn to love their bodies for what they are, instead of feeling bad because they aren't what media/advertising brainwashes them to try to be. And to treat your body with the love it deserves. It's just that at this time thin is the "in" thing, but at other times in history being fat was admired. I think people would be better off if they took into consideration that there is not just one way to be healthy. Like you said, take responsibility for your own life and body. How do you want your body and mind to feel, when does it feel right? Do your best to treat it this way, the way that you feel good about. I don't know how relevant that is to what you're saying, it might sound kind of off topic but I feel the stigma is a big part of the problem as a whole because social taboos massively affect self-esteem and body image. And like the first commenter said, depression is a huge factor in this, and that alone may account for a very large percentage of the population's weight issue.
>>Your advice is very credible and matter of fact, and a good solution to many different problems, and that's what I like about it.<<

Thank you!

>>I also add that people could stand to be less closed-minded about varying body types. There's a stereotype that suggests all overweight people are unhealthy and make bad decisions. <<

Yes, that's true. All condemnation does is make people miserable, and perhaps contribute to depression (which can drive overeating).

>>People can learn to love their bodies for what they are, instead of feeling bad because they aren't what media/advertising brainwashes them to try to be. And to treat your body with the love it deserves. It's just that at this time thin is the "in" thing, but at other times in history being fat was admired.<<

Precisely!

My body happens to be cold adapted. One of its rather clever tricks is wrapping a layer of insulating fat around the core. This helps retain body heat in cold weather, which in Illinois is very convenient. (The downside is that it's very hard to dump excess heat in summer; even though I drop weight then, I have to be careful.)

>>Do your best to treat it this way, the way that you feel good about. I don't know how relevant that is to what you're saying, it might sound kind of off topic but I feel the stigma is a big part of the problem as a whole because social taboos massively affect self-esteem and body image.<<

I think it's very relevant. People attach self-esteem to the stupidest things and it causes a heap of problems. The baseline is that all human beings have "inherent worth." You have a right to exist and to meet your needs. It's a necessary foundation for resisting bad input, because sometimes people pick on each other for spurious reasons. On top of that, you add self-esteem for your skills, accomplishments, and virtues: you might think well of yourself for earning a college degree, or growing a garden, or being patient. But like spurious criticism, spurious flattery is destructive; that's what wrecked the school system, praising kids even when they did a sloppy job. Everyone is good at something, and even things you're not great at can usually be improved with practice. Accept what you have, appreciate your strengths, and if there are weaknesses that really bug you -- do something about them, and give yourself credit for working on it.

You did a nice job summarizing all the factors. And you're right about our reactions, too, I think.
One of the things I try to do is condense large amounts of data from different sources into a concise set of facts or principles that people can actually apply to something. I'm glad to know that's working here.

green_knight

11 years ago

Yes...

ysabetwordsmith

11 years ago

I think it's important to find the right metaphor/strategy for dealing with food and exercise. Everyone has one, that thing that will motivate them to be healthy, but the trick is discovering what that factor is for you.
That's a good point. Many modern "exercise" modes are just a way to waste calories, which makes them boring. It's important to find something that's fun or interesting, and people like different things.
That ought to be an across-the-board litmus test for legislation. First, is there a reasonably clear "right thing"? If so, does the legislation make it easier to do the right thing and harder to do the wrong thing? We'd have more successful policies and laws then, I think.
That would help a lot. Sadly more laws are aimed at seeming to do something than at actually solving a problem. There are often strong barriers against actual solutions, because some problems benefit people in power.

Another of my guiding principles, this one from engineering, is "Find a way to make it do what you want while letting it do what it wants."
Add to this "availability of public transportation." If you have to walk, even just a block or two, to the bus station/subway station, you're burning off more calories than you would by getting into the car in your garage. That's without planning for it - but since leaving Tokyo I've never lived in a place where I could take the bus/train to work.
I think I would make this "feasibility of physical activity." There are all kinds of things that encourage people to get out and move, including but not limited to: parks, sidewalks, skate yards, dedicated bike paths, hiking trails, equestrian trails, etc. As you mentioned, walking to a bus or subway stop can also help.

The vast majority of America is lousy at this. Happily it's the kind of thing that can be improved without vast amounts of money and effort, even on a community level. It's just not that hard to make sure the sidewalks cover the whole town. Bike paths are a little more challenging. And the best trick with public transportation is to map where people want to go and where they come from, then connect those points. It can make for some odd-looking routes but it works. It's the wheeled equivalent of letting people beat down footpaths, then paving those.

Deleted comment

Exactly. If the official standards are skewed, and the social advice is skewed, the only reliable guides are internal (how your body feels, which people are taught to ignore) and practical (what your body can do, which is often disregarded).

My body is currently at a comfortable weight, a definite improvement over being underweight. It has padding in some nice places -- but my bone structure is still visible enough to make me an excellent table-dummy for teaching massage. My weight naturally fluctuates: rising in autumn as the cool weather spikes my appetite as insulation against winter, slanting down in late winter as cold burns off calories and spring activity burns more, then bottoming out in summer when my appetite tanks in the heat.

You have to know your own body, how it responds to outside input, how it feels, what it can do. Otherwise people can snow you with things they think are true that really aren't.

The more attention you pay to your body, the better you will get at interpreting its signals. Cravings, for instance, are your body's way of telling you that it's running short on some kind of material. It's kind of like having one of those printers with a different "low ink" light for each color. Cravings for fat can mean you're not getting enough calories (rare) or that you're eating food that burns off too fast (common). Cravings for salt can be triggered by low mineral levels, water-retention, or (oddly) some kinds of dehydration. Cravings for sugar are usually a spike problem: you eat a lot of sugar, it gives you an energy spike, then you crash and want more. That's best fixed by mixing the sugar with protein, carbohydrate, fat, and fiber so the food curve is modulated rather than spiky. Cravings for odd or specific foods, or the "I keep eating but I can't stay full" problem, are often due to a lack of some individual vitamin or mineral. Try eating different things until the alarm shuts off. Not tuning your diet in response to your body's alarms is a good way to get fat, because eating more of the wrong thing won't fix the problem, so you just eat more and more and more.

Re: Yes...

green_knight

11 years ago

Re: Yes...

ysabetwordsmith

11 years ago

green_knight

11 years ago

Hmm...

ysabetwordsmith

11 years ago

Deleted comment

I think a lot of the panic over people being "fat" is just hype to sell diets and "diet" food.

That being said, there are four things that even the stuff that calls itself "healthy" are loaded with:
1. HFCS
2. Soybean products (oil, protein)
3, salt
4. Partially hydrogenated fats

All of these things have been show to imbalance or damage the body's ability to properly process food, burn calories, or notify of full/sufficient. This in turn causes a general increase in weight.

These four things are directly related to increases in diabetes, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, IBS, weight gain, and allergic reactions. They also are very cheap, very "taste triggering", and make lots of money for the food packagers.

Trying to find unadulterated food these days is actually very difficult. Forget any boxed meals, canned soups, or frozen dinners. Even canned tuna these days has "vegetable broth" in it "for flavor" - read "vegetable broth" as "soy, salt, and a few real vegetables". I've gotten damn near obsessive about reading labels, lest a "treat" lead to hours on the john.

I eat out maybe once a month, and usually pay for it the next day.
>>I think a lot of the panic over people being "fat" is just hype to sell diets and "diet" food.<<

On the one hoof, this is true. Many people are hassled about being "fat" who are not, in fact, carrying more weight than their body can handle comfortably. On the other hoof, it is also true that the American population is heavier on average than it used to be, and much less healthy in some regards.

When I was little -- circa 30 years ago -- I was the only person in our social sphere with dietary issues and almost the only person with long-term health issues. There were elders who had some problems, which was to be expected; a few kids with asthma and a couple with structural disabilities; and that was about it. My issues got me stared at and bitched at constantly because they were so far out of people's experience and "ruined the day" for those whose tolerances were greater.

Now? Allergies are ubiquitous; most people seem to be allergic to one or more things, and the prevalence of serious allergies is also up. Chronic illnesses are up. There are more and more people, of all age groups, who are so wrecked that they fall under my capacity thresholds -- those limits that I used to get ragged on about all the time. Many many people are on one or more maintenance drugs; that used to be extremely rare (except for elders, again, where it was expected). I'm not at the upper edge of the "bad health" range anymore; I'm floating well into "average." Part of that is some improvements on my part, but most is other people plummeting past me. I know how much accommodation I have to do to get this body through ordinary activities; I've seen other people's accounts of how hard it is for them to keep their bodies going; and then I multiply that times the proportion shift and I can see where a lot of America's oomph went. Too many people are using up their energy just dragging their bodies through everyday activities. That worries me.



Re: Thoughts

ysabetwordsmith

11 years ago

There's a lot I could say but I'll just point out one thing, which is obscured by the way you wrote this part:

Eating disorder does not equal skinny or too thin. Many fat people are that way because they have an eating disorder as well. "Eating disorder" does not only mean restricting food. AND -- the real fun -- you can have an eating disorder, restrict your food severely, and STILL be fat.

I wanted to mention this bc far too many people assume "too thin" = "medical problem" and "too fat" = "Put down the cheeseburger, fatso."
That's why I said "eating disorder" instead of "anorexia." It covers more ground. Eating disorders are often driven by poor body image and a desire to be skinny, whether one is or not. (Another drive is control.)