Of course, I heard some of my grandfather's stories about labor wars. If the two sides haven't gone back to beating each other to death with bats in back alleys and dumping the corpses into the nearest body of water, then the labor war isn't back at full cry yet.
Union Suppression
Of course, I heard some of my grandfather's stories about labor wars. If the two sides haven't gone back to beating each other to death with bats in back alleys and dumping the corpses into the nearest body of water, then the labor war isn't back at full cry yet.
-
A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap
Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…
-
Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21
Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…
-
Bingo
I have made bingo down the B, G, and O columns of my 6-1-21 card for the Cottoncandy Bingo fest. I also have one extra fill. B1 (caretaking) --…
May 22 2009, 11:40:21 UTC 12 years ago
May 22 2009, 11:42:10 UTC 12 years ago
Optomistic take on things. :-)
Deleted comment
Hmm...
May 22 2009, 23:50:35 UTC 12 years ago
May 22 2009, 13:58:09 UTC 12 years ago Edited: May 22 2009, 14:08:15 UTC
As the other comments to this posting show, we need a new kind of union in this country, one that harks back to the founding principles of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW, see http://www.iww.org/) in 1905. The style of union that has thrived under the NLRB's rules has elitist characteristics that divide the working class up into "the union side of the shop" and the workers who are excluded from unions. Such unions are always fighting for their turf at the expense of other workers. They have tended to make common cause with organized crime and even management-funded think-tanks before making effective alliances with the "employees at will" who work in the same field or under the same employer. Now that the UAW has been effectively de-fanged, it probably will not be attracting many new members.
Maybe the "Employee Free Choice Act" will allow groups of workers who have been excluded to organize on the tried-and-true principle of "An injury to one is an injury to all". New unions will have open membership that is not tied to a particular job description or work-site, and they will collect dues directly from members, rather than through payroll deductions. They will not subscribe to such principles as "What's good for General Motors is good for the UAW". Union membership will not terminate on being laid off.
I recommend John O'Connor's song, "The Ballad of Labor Law" for a quick musical tutorial on how our laws got this way. His webpage is at http://johnpauloconnor.wordpress.com/music/we-aint-gonna-give-it-back/ , and his last.fm page is at http://www.last.fm/music/John+O%27Connor
Thoughts
May 22 2009, 23:49:15 UTC 12 years ago
That would help. Better yet would be employers removing their collective head from its current location and realizing that well-treated people work far more efficiently than poorly-treated people, and improving work situations so that unions are no longer necessary.
>>The style of union that has thrived under the NLRB's rules has elitist characteristics that divide the working class up into "the union side of the shop" and the workers who are excluded from unions. <<
In my opinion, excluding workers pretty much defeats the whole point of having a union in the first place.