What they really need to do is declare that some places -- like shorelines and fire chimneys -- are no longer suitable for building in. That will happen sooner or later, because you can't rebuild indefinitely in a worsening threat zone. Sooner would mean a more controlled retreat with less money wasted and lives lost. It would be better to close out the obvious threat zones, but at bare minimum, if a building has been totaled twice, don't rebuild it again in the same place.
Shifting Risks
What they really need to do is declare that some places -- like shorelines and fire chimneys -- are no longer suitable for building in. That will happen sooner or later, because you can't rebuild indefinitely in a worsening threat zone. Sooner would mean a more controlled retreat with less money wasted and lives lost. It would be better to close out the obvious threat zones, but at bare minimum, if a building has been totaled twice, don't rebuild it again in the same place.
Recent Posts from This Journal
-
Rose-breasted Grosbeak
I saw a rose-breasted grosbeak on the hopper feeder. I don't think I've seen one in summer before. They usually appear in spring. We had some for…
-
Recipe: "Shrimp and Baby Corn Stir-Fry"
We made this tonight, inspired by a shrimp boil. It was kind of a hassle, but turned out pretty well. "Shrimp and Baby Corn Stir-Fry"…
-
Birdfeeding
Today is mostly sunny, muggy, and warm. I fed the birds. I've seen house finches. I took a few pictures in the yard. EDIT 7/4/21 -- I picked half…
- Post a new comment
- 0 comments
- Post a new comment
- 0 comments