The lack of female Einsteins is all down to numbersWhy are there so few female Einsteins? Many people share a belief that while women can do science, there are far fewer women than men at the very top of the science hierarchy because women just aren't as innately good at science as men. Others feel this view is wrong but cannot easily put their finger on why.
They should be able to now. There are few women at the top of science because there are so few women in science. It's simple statistics.
This makes me wonder about the success of women writing speculative fiction. It would be interesting to chart the numbers of women vs. men submitting manuscripts to speculative fiction magazines, the respective numbers of publications resulting from those efforts, and then the numbers of award winners ... and see if statistics alone can account for the differences in the latter two categories.
December 24 2008, 04:18:55 UTC 12 years ago
for more information (a journal recommendation)
December 24 2008, 07:37:37 UTC 12 years ago Edited: December 24 2008, 07:39:50 UTC
Posts she has made so far:
Posts she still plans to write:
Probably more, too.
Since
Science!
Re: for more information (a journal recommendation)
December 24 2008, 10:34:38 UTC 12 years ago
The more I learn, the less I believe the 'innate genetical differences' theory.
Re: for more information (a journal recommendation)
December 24 2008, 16:47:58 UTC 12 years ago
Deleted comment
Hmm...
December 24 2008, 18:17:15 UTC 12 years ago
>> It all goes back to Eve, doesn't it? <<
*shrug* Only for people who take the Bible too seriously.
We are the Other People.
Deleted comment
Re: Hmm...
December 25 2008, 03:07:15 UTC 12 years ago
Because that data is less accessible and relevant. The part that concerns me is what happens after women start participating in the publishing industry. Some people have attempted submission/gender counts, though you're right that it's not easy.