Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

Economic News

These articles caught my eye today...

The FCC's Plan to Censor the Internet
Washington, D.C.--The Federal Communications Commission is preparing to auction off a portion of the airwaves for Internet use. Under the terms of the auction, the winning bidder would be forced to use a quarter of the auctioned spectrum to provide free wireless Internet service to all Americans.

"Since no ISP can compete with free, omnipresent Internet access, this plan means that virtually all online users will be herded into the government-controlled Internet. And as the history of radio and television has shown, once the government guarantees 'free' access to a communications medium, it will inevitably exercise control over its content--i.e., censorship.

"In fact, this plan already comes with censorship strings attached; the FCC has declared that this 'free' Internet must filter out pornography and other material deemed unsuitable for children. Not only will this prevent vast numbers of Americans from accessing content the government regards as inappropriate, but it will unavoidably lead to massive self-censorship by websites struggling to avoid government sanitization.


I think the idea of free Internet connection is a great idea, but it's largely useless if censored. By the time things are reduced to what is suitable for children, they aren't suitable for much of what adults need to do with them.


World markets slump as US car industry bail-out fails
Republicans in the US Senate refused to support a bill to help the carmakers, endorsed by the White House and congressional Democrats. Republican demands for union wage cuts derailed a last-ditch effort to push the emergency aid through before the end of the year. The breakdown left the car industry - which employs 3 million people - in limbo. General Motors and Chrysler have warned that they will go bankrupt this month if they do not receive $14bn in taxpayer funds.


I'm thrilled that the Republicans in the Senate made a terrific last-minute block of this bailout. I'm not against spending large amounts of taxpayer money to fix the economy, but I sure am against giving large amounts of taxpayer money to companies whose bad decisions have brought them to failure. Let them fail. It's a necessary part of capitalism.


Marie Cocco | Unions Aren't the Problem
Marie Cocco, Truthdig: "As Congress and the White House lurch toward possible approval of a loan package for the crippled auto industry, we are undoubtedly in store for more union-bashing. Note well that we did not hear any such tirades when vastly larger sums of taxpayer money - with fewer strings attached - were lavished upon the banks and financial industry wizards who created the credit crisis."


Remember that unions are only useful in situations where the company is trying to abuse large numbers of workers so severely that they are willing to expend large amounts of energy and money to prevent that. If workers are treated well and given enough investiture in the company's success, then everyone's on the same side and much enthusiasm results. There are companies that do this; emulate them. Those that won't ... well, that's what unions are for.


Linda Hirshman | Where Are the New Jobs for Women?
Linda Hirshman, The New York Times: "Mr. Obama compared his infrastructure plan to the Eisenhower-era construction of the Interstate System of
highways. It brings back the Eisenhower era in a less appealing way as well: there are almost no women on this road to recovery."avished upon the banks and financial industry wizards who created the credit crisis."


What, women can't make roads or fix bridges? Sorry, I wasn't aware that a jackhammer was operated with the user's penis.


Joseph E. Stiglitz | Capitalist Fools
Joseph E. Stiglitz, Vanity Fair: "There will come a moment when the most urgent threats posed by the credit crisis have eased and the larger task before us will be to chart a direction for the economic steps ahead. This will be a dangerous moment. Behind the debates over future policy is a debate over history - a debate over the causes of our current situation. The battle for the past will determine the battle for the present. So it's crucial to get the history straight."


Major economic upheavals usually lead to attempts to keep history from repeating itself. So far, we have yet to figure out a way that works for more than a few decades before being torn down. Most people, it seems, are only capable of learning from painful personal experience.

Here's a radical idea: let's put a minimum of age of, say, 60 or 65 on economic workers. To be an economist, or someone else in a position of high influence over the economy, you have to be old enough to have seen the market go up and down several times. This would also have the advantage of providing vital work for elders who don't want to leave the workforce.
Tags: economics, news
Subscribe

Recent Posts from This Journal

  • Fieldhaven as Habitat

    If you follow my posts on gardening, birdfeeding, and photos, then you know that I garden for wildlife. Looking at the YardMap parameters, here…

  • A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap

    Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…

  • Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21

    Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 13 comments
Hirshman appears to be a fully fledged eejit.

It is dangerous to have "men's jobs" and "women's jobs" - we've been fighting that for a hundred years now and she wants us back in our nurturing straitjackets.

Jeez - have some women learned NOTHING!
I can the see the point that the jobs intended for creation are in sectors currently favoring men. But that doesn't mean women can't aim for them -- that's how we got women doctors and lawyers and such. Most especially the green-collar jobs will typically be things that require knowledge more than raw physical strength; women could make big gains their quickly, because the field is still new enough to be short on experts, making it easier to enter. Saying "those are all men's jobs" just short-circuits the whole process ... which actually supports the very patriarchy the article was intending to criticize! Bah and humbug, I say. If I see a green job I think I can do, I'll put in for it; maybe somebody will need a writer or a networker there.
I know of women electricians, plumbers, engineers, surveyors, construction project managers...

Thirty five years ago, there was a medical school built in the English midlands with ten times as many male bathrooms as female, because only 5-10% of medical students were women. Now they are in the majority. Expectations have to change before anything else.
Sorry, I wasn't aware that a jackhammer was operated with the user's penis.

My first thought: LOL!

My second thought: ...ow.
... a jackhammer does vibrate a lot.
It would clearly be better if women operated jackhammers with their vagina! *sagely nod*
Wouldn't that sort of make it into a jillhammer?
BWAH! Well served. XD
I, and I'm sure a lot of other people, would happily keep paying for uncensored Internet access.
I read elsewhere that the free band would also run slower than paid services. That's generally a great plan: basic service free, enhanced service for a charge (or various packages at different prices).
Maybe it could operate like NPR or PBS? Now PBS style "free" aka "viewer supported" internet would be GREAT. I know both NPR and PBS deal with government/FCC restrictions and still manage to have a great program.... I wouldn't discount the filtering as completely useless to adults.

Dove
Let them fail.

THANK YOU. I'm glad I'm not the only one. I don't know if you saw my rant about that.

Re: Unions

I had to say that just the other day. :/ Unions and demanding higher wages are not at fault. More people deserve a decent living ffs. We should not be operating on minimum wage and needing multiple people to live together because none of them could live independently on their income.

What, women can't make roads or fix bridges? Sorry, I wasn't aware that a jackhammer was operated with the user's penis.

EXACTLY. Canada is trying to make a huge push for women to get into skilled trades. There's no reason women can't do it, and it's somethign which is ALWAYS needed, good times or bad.

As for the economists, we should also require a mandatory annual (or twice a year) cognitive analysis by a doctor who knows what they're doing. We need to know asap if they start to develop dementia of any sort.
Censored internet? Hell will freeze over first. No seriously! Too many people would rise up in outraged protest before such a thing could ever be allowed to happen.

Recent Posts from This Journal

  • Fieldhaven as Habitat

    If you follow my posts on gardening, birdfeeding, and photos, then you know that I garden for wildlife. Looking at the YardMap parameters, here…

  • A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap

    Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…

  • Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21

    Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…