Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

Musicians don’t want tunes used for torture

This is an excellent new approach in pressuring the American government to cease torture:

Musicians don’t want tunes used for torture

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba - Blaring from a speaker behind a metal grate in his tiny cell in Iraq, the blistering rock from Nine Inch Nails hit Prisoner No. 200343 like a sonic bludgeon.

Now the detainees aren’t the only ones complaining. Musicians are banding together to demand the U.S. military stop using their songs as weapons.


This also gave me some new insights. I suspect that somewhere in the chain of command, the purported goal of obtaining information has changed to a goal of crippling prisoners so that if released they will be ineffective as threats. Or anything else, for that matter, including functional human beings. It's possible to break people that way. It's also dangerous, because under extreme stress some people break in the direction of transcendental evolution. That's a whole new flavor of empowering enemies while trying to destroy them.
Tags: activism, music
Subscribe

Recent Posts from This Journal

  • Fieldhaven as Habitat

    If you follow my posts on gardening, birdfeeding, and photos, then you know that I garden for wildlife. Looking at the YardMap parameters, here…

  • A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap

    Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…

  • Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21

    Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 13 comments
What about that one city in the US (I wish I had been paying more attention when I heard this info on the radio) which uses music as a punishment for people who consistently break the noise bylaw? Once a year or a few times a year (I forget which) they bring in the worst offenders, sit them down, and force them to listen to Barry Manilow and Barney the Dinosaur for an hour.

Doing this has drastically reduced the noise problem.

Yeah, when I heard the last half of that story, I totally wished I'd been paying more attention.
I think there's a difference between an action meant to teach and an action meant to cripple. Playing music for an hour to discourage someone from disturbing the peace may be unpleasant, but it isn't harmful -- in fact it's less harmful and more likely to succeed than conventional approaches like fines or jail. Playing music at painful volume for 20 hours a day, for a month or two, is damaging and may well be intended to do lasting harm.

For further contemplation of appropriate and inappropriate responses to wrongdoing, I recommend "The Admonishments of Kherishdar" here:
http://www.stardancer.org/kherishdar2/
The culture is alien, but many of the underlying concepts still apply.
One of the songs of a folksinger who lives here in Guelph was apparently blasted at top wattage toward the ranch of George Bush in Texas for a while, but inside it would hardly have been deafening.

Music constantly played at a volume that's painful is deafening, short-term and long-term, and would make proper sleep impossible ... the only thing worse in that regard for a prisoner would be random short respites.
I wonder if they're taking a page from Bush Sr. I'm pretty sure that when the Ameican army went after Noriaga, they blared Judas Priest at him. Or so that's what I heard.

These are torture tactics worthy of Voldemort.

Transcendental evolution?
I think Voldemort would be getting more successful results, actually.

Transcendental evolution is what happens when a latent saint or messiah goes active. It's a little hard to describe in English. But look at religious history around the world and you'll see that a lot of messiahs and saints were at some point caught and tortured, or otherwise placed under extreme stress. Some souls are always in the world with, hm, emergency response abilities tucked away. It takes a lot to activate those; the more powerful the person's potential, the higher the threshold. Of course, there are transcendent people who arrive in active mode -- the lamas for example -- but the latent ones are there to deal with disasters and atrocities. You really, really do not want to be leaning over one with a knife when that light goes on.

Also, any human soul has some potential for radical transformation, metamorphosis under stress. Some of the results are nasty, like certain types of charismatic warleaders or zealots. Some are ordinary people abruptly reaching saint potential for the first time. The soul, like the body, can sometimes achieve great things in moments of dire need ... but unlike the body, the soul's abrupt growth can stick in that position sometimes. This is why some cultures practice spiritual disciplines of extreme stress -- fasting, vigils, self-mutilation, etc. The harder you push, the bigger the risk and the bigger the potential breakthrough. Many people just suffer, some people break, some people die ... and some people become conduits for the living divine, of assorted flavors.

If you look at history, you can spot some interesting examples. It's one of several reasons why torture, especially on a large scale, is almost always a Very Bad Idea.
Wow. Just... wow.
Some of the stories of what enlightened ones have done are impressive examples of what can be gotten away with if you have the ability to make physics look the other way for a second.
Indeed.

Of course, reality is just consensus-created. If one has a strong enough Will and enough access to one's spiritual powers, one can change the consensus of reality once in a while.
Precisely.

Think of reality like a computer network or program. Most people can only influence the lowest layer, which has certain options ("read textbook," "kiss girl," etc.) that anyone can use. If your magical, spiritual, or philosophical tradition teaches you how to log in, then you get some additional user benefits ("pray: message > God," "sense ambient magic," etc.) but still at a basic level. Above that are layers upon layers of more rarefied access, which require more study, knowledge, and skill to reach. Each one lets you do more. Some layers allow you to make brief exceptions to standard parameters, or more properly, shift the parameters applied to a given situation. The higher your level, the more dramatic the changes you can make.
So people in touch with their spiritual powers have leet spiritual hacking skills? :-)

Or maybe life is like a video game, and some people are able to figure out cheat codes? :-)

Sort of relevant:
_dear_santa

Very relevant:
kohrain_vwon
Sort of like that. However, it's more like the way some systems are set up to give different amounts of authority: guests can see things but can't change much, users can change some things, forum moderators can do special things like deleting messages or blocking users, and sysadmins can do anything. Programmers create systems. The rule "you can only make changes to your own account" applies to users, but not guests (who have no account) or moderators (who can ban troublesome accounts). Hacks and cheats aren't part of intended usage; permission gradients are.

People get into arguments over what constitutes a "hack" or "cheat" of reality, compared to what are simply different permission gradients. If Jesus heals someone, it's a sysadmin privilege. If a regular person heals someone, it's a cheat code you must have gotten from SatanicHacker, and you tend to get banned from Christian.relg for it. Some people will look the other way for things like healing, while others will throw a fit about it; depends on the time and place. Other systems may allow that kind of function at lower levels, or not at all.
Sort of like that. However, it's more like the way some systems are set up to give different amounts of authority: guests can see things but can't change much, users can change some things, forum moderators can do special things like deleting messages or blocking users, and sysadmins can do anything. Programmers create systems.

The only problem I have with this view of things is that it implies a seperation between the users and the programmers. But one's Highest Self (soul, spirit, whatever) IS God, so there *is* no seperation between users and programmers, except the illusion of seperation. Which that illusion is also all that seperates us from one another.

This thread kinda reminds me of something. Let me go dig that up... *starts digging around in her trunk*

Wow, for a while there I thought I wasn't going to find it. Here it is: http://alex-antonin.livejournal.com/21002.html

Recent Posts from This Journal

  • Fieldhaven as Habitat

    If you follow my posts on gardening, birdfeeding, and photos, then you know that I garden for wildlife. Looking at the YardMap parameters, here…

  • A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap

    Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…

  • Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21

    Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…