Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

The Louisiana Purchase

... wasn't a real estate deal.  It was an agreement between empires about who got to commit genocide in a given area, without challenge from other empires.  The legal repercussions of this continue today, as for example, using violent force at Standing Rock to trample people's rights yet again.
Tags: economics, ethnic studies, history, news
Subscribe

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 2 comments
You are quite right. Most people don't think about the fact that these lands were already owned and occupied by people.
You are also right that it wasn't a real estate deal. What was sold was the water tributory rights (or something to that effect). Lewis and Clark were sent out to discover just how far it extended into the interior of North America.
Napoleon also got a huge chunk of change with which to keep making mischief over in Europe. Louisiana was chicken feed compared to Europe so far as he was concerned.
:^|

*Anger fists* DOWN WITH THE SYSTEM!