Of the states that give more money than they get, 78% are Democratic.
NOW who's redistributing wealth unfairly?
Details here.
Starting now, the Poetry Fishbowl is open! Today's theme is "Reality is stranger than fiction." I will be checking this page periodically throughout…
These are the content notes for " The Little Shadow Across the Grass." Read about the Grunge. The Ghost Dance was meant to " roll…
These are the setting notes for " The Little Shadow Across the Grass." Read about the Blackfeet Reservation. This map shows Glacier…
Starting now, the Poetry Fishbowl is open! Today's theme is "Reality is stranger than fiction." I will be checking this page periodically throughout…
These are the content notes for " The Little Shadow Across the Grass." Read about the Grunge. The Ghost Dance was meant to " roll…
These are the setting notes for " The Little Shadow Across the Grass." Read about the Blackfeet Reservation. This map shows Glacier…
Re: Hmm...
October 31 2008, 21:34:13 UTC 12 years ago
I want people in office who are interested in being public servants, yes, but not necessarily like "ordinary people". I want to be served by people who are smarter, better informed, more visionary and more diplomatic than I am. People who are better at this than me, otherwise I'd just want to do it myself.
The good thing about democracy is that you can change things. The bad thing, though, is that you are always going to want change. You are bound to eventually vote for the losing candidate. The majority may want something you don't particularly like, but you have to live with it anyway.
Re: Hmm...
November 1 2008, 00:53:09 UTC 12 years ago
When it becomes your career to be a politician, you stop making decisions based on what your community needs and start making decisions you think will keep the money coming in.
Re: Hmm...
November 1 2008, 01:01:36 UTC 12 years ago
Re: Hmm...
November 1 2008, 14:46:07 UTC 12 years ago
This is because I have worked for several years now as a contract IT person. I never spend more than a year in one job. And I can see how inefficient that is. It takes a year to learn a corporate culture, to learn an industry, to get a real feel for the longterm consequences of the little decisions you make. I almost always leave a position wishing I could redo everything.
Also, I've seen the effect on a company of not having long-time employees. The last corporation I worked at is moving to outsourcing most of its IT operation, pressuring employees to take early retirement, bringing in temps and contract employees, etc. Nobody knows what's going on, nobody knows how we solved similar problems in the past, nobody remembers the nuances and little problems that turn around and bite you later....
Now, you might think that it's not right to compare the government to a large corporation, but I think it's a completely valid comparison. Most of the behind-the-scenes functions are exactly the same. Any governing body larger than a dozen people is going to need an IT department (even if it's just one guy). They're going to need HR, and PR, and financial planning, etc.
Worse, government needs longterm planning. If someone knows they're leaving office in a year or two and don't have a chance of being re-elected, they're not so likely to take an interest in what's going to happen five years from now.
So, while I do recognize the problems of career politicians, I think the drawbacks are even greater.
Re: Hmm...
November 2 2008, 00:58:56 UTC 12 years ago
Yeah, one year is probably too short. For some offices, two years is the term and for others it's four. I don't think a limit of two terms per office is unreasonable.
>>Now, you might think that it's not right to compare the government to a large corporation, but I think it's a completely valid comparison.<<
I think the comparison is all too valid.
>>Worse, government needs longterm planning. If someone knows they're leaving office in a year or two and don't have a chance of being re-elected, they're not so likely to take an interest in what's going to happen five years from now.<<
I hate to say it, but most people today don't seem capable of long-term planning and politicians are downright allergic to it. Even the Supreme Court judges don't do it, and they are posted for life. It would take a lot more than limitless service to fix that one.
*ponder* We might consider making most of the political jobs part-time again. They all started out that way; people kept their dayjob to make a living, and politics was just an extra. It was more like volunteer work with a stipend. I think we got better people in it then.
Re: Hmm...
November 2 2008, 03:27:51 UTC 12 years ago
We're not politicians, but I don't think the situation is much different for those who are. For most politicians, the alternative is lucrative private law practice.
Re: Hmm...
November 3 2008, 06:47:06 UTC 12 years ago
Any ideas on how to improve over the current not-great situation, then?