Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

Literary Awards Favor Men

Not just male writers, but also male characters. For instance, if you want to win a Pulitzer, you must include men/boys and your chance is higher if you are a man yourself.  The awards with the most representation of female characters and writers are the least prestigious.

My solution?  Fuck 'em.  I'll be over here in crowdfunding, where I can write what I damn please and sell it to people who share my interests, or request what I want and get it.  Somebody mentioned a dearth of female friendships last week.  I said, "Yeah, good point.  I'll request that in a friend's Monday prompt call."  And I did, so now there's one more F&F story there are FOUR more F&F stories in the world.  :D  Also if you look at my Serial Poetry page you can see that my audience loves women.  I have several series where BOTH leads are women: The Origami Mage (rivals), Path of the Paladins (mentor/novice), and Walking the Beat (wives).  I care less about awards than I do about writing great stuff and selling it.  However, this also means I rely more on my audience to boost the signal so that folks who want to read this weird shit can find it amidst the slew of space marines and miniskirted urban fantasy babes.
Tags: awards, gender studies, news, reading, writing
Subscribe

  • A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap

    Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…

  • Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21

    Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…

  • Bingo

    I have made bingo down the B, G, and O columns of my 6-1-21 card for the Cottoncandy Bingo fest. I also have one extra fill. B1 (caretaking) --…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 5 comments

author_by_night

June 9 2015, 20:19:07 UTC 6 years ago Edited:  June 9 2015, 20:19:21 UTC

My solution? Fuck 'em.

+1

OT, but you keep mentioning crowdfunding. I'm new to your LJ, so I'll ask - what do you mean, exactly? When I hear it I think of people raising money on GoFundMe, but I'm beginning to think you mean something else.

I think it can be hard to represent female friendships sometimes, especially as some female writers were actively excluded and tormented by the other girls as children and the general response by the responsible adults is 'girls can be bitchy'. If the excluded girl isn't 'bitchy', she will take that to mean that 'bitchy is normal' and she's 'weird'. It's hard to write about something you haven't experienced and something you believe is 'universal' but so cruel that you don't want to write it and have readers believe it's good for girls and women to behave like that.
It's also difficult to get adult female friendships as an adult if you were actively excluded from them when younger. If some lonely woman asks for advice on how to make friends with other women on the internet and dares to admit she's never been friends with females, she will be savaged in the comment section or the forum with other women telling her she must be untrustworthy, arrogant, sleeping around, exploiting male friendships and 'a bitch'. There were one or two women who pointed out that their exclusionary behaviour was probably why friendless women can't make any though, which is a good sign, but there's no solution to changing these attitudes.
To be fair, I often consider female friendships like acquaintances even though I care about them just as much as my male ones- I'm just worried I'll be gossiped about, yelled at or kicked to the kerb without warning. I'm also trying to write female friendships in the way I wanted them as a child. Yes, they'll banter, they'll argue, they'll ask each other about other women due to concern but they will not be mean-spirited or two-faced.
Violette does call Claire a bitch once, but it's an angry outburst borne of seeing her hero rip a very young nursing assistant to shreds over an accidental overdose given to others (here, as people are already dead, this is unpleasant but not ultimately harmful so Claire was being unnecessarily cruel and could have prevented the mistake due her better literacy). Violette is so upset she bawls her eyes out, promptly walks into a door and hurts herself. She's not being evil nor objective. Claire does grumpily help her and later tries to be more tactful and mindful of others. She's not evil nor a 'bitch', just a bit of a hothead and frustrated with others like some very clever, quick people get. 'Bitchy' is not normal or acceptable and should not be written like it is.
This is why the term 'social skills' bugs me. Teachers will always say a friendless child has none and a child surrounded by friends has plenty but will completely ignore the fact that the isolated child could have better manners and buy into treating others how they wish to be treated and that the popular child may be a bully or insensitive to kids not like them. They may even shame the isolated child for having traits a sane person would want to see in a child and berate them when they will be saddened by constant exclusion or provoked by the bullies. It's not social skills, it's the Halo/Horns Effect.

>>I think it can be hard to represent female friendships sometimes, especially as some female writers were actively excluded and tormented by the other girls as children and the general response by the responsible adults is 'girls can be bitchy'. If the excluded girl isn't 'bitchy', she will take that to mean that 'bitchy is normal' and she's 'weird'. <<

Yes, that's true. Some people are lucky to find real friends later, but others aren't. And it's also true that if you taste in female friendship is more about discussing how to settle Mars than who's fucking whom, statistically speaking the number of potential friendships is much smaller.

>>It's also difficult to get adult female friendships as an adult if you were actively excluded from them when younger.<<

What it really means is that adult women follow cliques as ruthlessly as children do, and if you were ever "out" then they never want you "in."

>> To be fair, I often consider female friendships like acquaintances even though I care about them just as much as my male ones- I'm just worried I'll be gossiped about, yelled at or kicked to the kerb without warning.<<

Credible threat, unless you observe a specific woman sticking up for people who aren't present.

>> I'm also trying to write female friendships in the way I wanted them as a child. Yes, they'll banter, they'll argue, they'll ask each other about other women due to concern but they will not be mean-spirited or two-faced.<<

Good for you! I do this too.

>>She's not evil nor a 'bitch', just a bit of a hothead and frustrated with others like some very clever, quick people get.<<

Well played.

>>This is why the term 'social skills' bugs me. Teachers will always say a friendless child has none and a child surrounded by friends has plenty but will completely ignore the fact that the isolated child could have better manners and buy into treating others how they wish to be treated and that the popular child may be a bully or insensitive to kids not like them. <<

Social skills are real, but not the only factor. A person with good social skills is more likely to be popular than someone without. But other factors include parental finances, skin tone, beauty standard, and whether the person has something that other people want. Adults often overlook these factors. Furthermore, social skills include good manners. A bully doesn't really have friends; they have cronies. The functionality is different just as the means of attraction is different. A bully may have charisma or resources, but their emotional intelligence and social skills tend to be low.

I handle this a lot in my writing. Some of my characters are mean because they enjoy hurting people; Shiv is like that. Some are just socially inept, like Mason. Lawrence has minimal social skills due to lack of opportunity, so he's learning them from Stan; but he actually managed to put together a functional set based on logic rather than intuition for running the chess club. Angelica can be downright cruel to people she dislikes, but it's not a prevailing trait or else Stan wouldn't have stuck with her for so long.
My solution? Fuck 'em.

:-D
Women buy more fiction than men, and they like fiction about women and will buy it -- in romance and any other genre.

So fuck 'em and laugh all the way to the bank. Female readers are gold mines.

To say nothing about literary merit, but that's no problem.

You can have female characters, female authors, artistic merit, money, and less prestige. That's not so bad.