Culture is an exchange. In order to continue, a society must meet the survival and social needs of its citizens. They need ways of supporting themselves, interacting, and expressing ideas. What people value tends to continue. What they do not value will be hidden or lost. So if you don't support art, then you wind up with very little art, of poorer quality. If you don't make sure people have enough to live on, then not only do they suffer, but they can't afford to buy stuff and your economy tanks. Not everything has to be a cash exchange, that's a relatively recent phenomenon historically speaking. But there must be an exchange of value and people must get their needs met.
This is a time of great challenge and great potential. A lot of people are getting into creative work because that's all they CAN do -- they aren't permitted a day job by the people who control the businesses. They still need to survive, so they scrabble for what they can do that DOESN'T require someone else's permission to have a job. That's often art, music, writing, things that are less controlled than businesses you need an expensive license even to attempt. There are business models now that help connect creators directly to the audience in ways that cut out middlemen and route more money to the people making stuff. But the audience can be a stingy bastard sometimes. That's especially true if people don't have enough to live on, or if they've had their pockets picked so much they FEEL like that don't have enough even after they've managed to scrape up more. The pervasive sense of threat, that failure and starvation are just a day's bad luck and a few weeks of unemployment away, erodes the cohesion of society as a whole.
What can you do? Think mindfully about what it costs you to make things and how much your talent is worth. Think mindfully about how much other people's work is worth to you, and whether you can afford that. If money is tight, which it often is when a few people are hogging so damn much of it, then look for alternatives. You might not have cash to pay for what you want, but you may have something the other person wants that you could trade. Money is only valuable when there's enough to get the job done. If there isn't, it's useless as a medium of exchange. But you always have your skills. You have resources. Other people have different ones. So trade.
And value each other's hard work, because somebody has to, and it's painfully clear that the people at the top of the heap care fuckall about you, art, or the sustainability of society.
December 9 2014, 14:40:12 UTC 6 years ago
Well said, and it needs to be said.
And also heard and listened to, which are harder.
December 9 2014, 18:53:51 UTC 6 years ago
* Teachers
* Artists (there are exceptions, but on the whole, it's true)
* People who work with the developmentally disabled
These, and possibly others, should be of the HIGHEST value, and should be getting paid the MOST to do their jobs, especially teachers. But no, corporate America wants people smart enough to run the machines but too dumb to question authority, and well-funded schools tend to produce kids that are too smart for our plutocrats to abide.
And then, too, some groups find ways to inflate the value of their work to absurd heights. A good example of this is the medical profession: important, yes, but the price of everything in the medical profession is so absurdly overpriced that doctors make money hand over fist. (If you don't think medical prices are absurdly overpriced, my roommate once got charged $300 just for a single ride in an ambulance. That's at least 1000% higher than it ought to be, and I only wish that were an exaggeration. An ambulance ride should be $30; 1000% of 30 is 300. And then you get professions like chiropractors, which back in the 90's were charging $30 for 10 minutes of pushing on your back. And therapists, charging as much as $100 an hour for you to vent your feelings at them. WTF??? Prices like that, they almost need a space between the e and the r.)
Another good example of a group artificially inflating their worth is colleges. College tuition is absurdly high, and literally the only reason for it is greed; the people running the colleges keep raising the tuition to see how many gullible people they can get to pay those ridiculous prices, putting themselves into lifelong debt they cannot legally claim bankruptcy on. Add to it the absurdly high cost for books, the fact that used books are not allowed in most colleges, and the fact that going to college is a gamble anyway, and it's a Ponzii scheme to make Enron look like chump change.
I would count sports figures in that group, too, but honestly *their* value is being inflated by the people making money selling tickets to the games, the owners of the teams. But the basic value distortion is the same: here we have a group of people who shouldn't even be able to make a career out of tossing a ball around, or at the very least should be making just enough at it to get by, but instead they're making millions of dollars every year. Honestly, the salaries for sports figures and teachers should be switched around. But capitalism encourages people to care about nothing but greed. It is an inherently evil economic system but the evil just keeps perpetuating itself because greed is a powerful motivator, and money is power.
Thoughts
December 10 2014, 10:00:42 UTC 6 years ago
I agree.
>> Another good example of a group artificially inflating their worth is colleges. <<
This can be protested by hiring people based on their skill, not on paperwork.
December 10 2014, 19:36:29 UTC 6 years ago
It's the institutions- insurance companies, big pharm, instrument makers, hospitals, etc.- that are raking in the big bucks. Something single-payer would put a lid on...
December 9 2014, 21:55:22 UTC 6 years ago
Wow!
December 9 2014, 23:29:00 UTC 6 years ago
If you haven't already found
Re: Wow!
December 10 2014, 01:47:39 UTC 6 years ago
I have a few series running, really. A few have mostly wound down, as I've finished long-term projects, like the studio buildout series and the travelling instrument case buildout series, but things like the above and the sexism and racism in geek culture posts get added to whenever I think of something. XD
Basically I tried to write fiction and was terrible at it? But I'm not a terrible essayist and technical writer. So I still write words, just... not fiction. Except in songs, I guess. :D
Re: Wow!
December 10 2014, 09:07:47 UTC 6 years ago
December 9 2014, 22:35:09 UTC 6 years ago
Thank you!
December 9 2014, 23:00:06 UTC 6 years ago
There are noncash support methods for crowdfunding also! It's about exchanging value not necessarily money. Your attention, word-of-mouth advertising, links, recommendations, feedback, prompts, etc. all have different benefits. Use what you have.
I'm usually broke too. If I had enough money to live on comfortably, then I would set a monthly budget as a percentage of my crowdfunding take to reinvest in other people's crowdfunded projects. As it is, I make a $5-10 donation when I can afford it. BUT I am one heck of a barker, and a lot of people read me for the purpose of finding new projects. That matters. I'm also a dandy source of ideas.
Re: Thank you!
December 10 2014, 17:19:42 UTC 6 years ago
December 10 2014, 19:32:36 UTC 6 years ago
Yes...
December 10 2014, 19:42:42 UTC 6 years ago
Re: Yes...
December 10 2014, 23:52:22 UTC 6 years ago
Well, barter takes us out of that.
Money worked really well to ease the problems of barter, like- what if I want apples, and can offer yarn, but the apple vendor doesn't want yarn but wants a knife. It gets unwieldy pretty fast! However, the PLUS is that no one gets to siphon off part of the value in each transaction.
Hmm. I may have an essay here...
Re: Yes...
December 11 2014, 06:15:20 UTC 6 years ago
That's a problem.
>> Well, barter takes us out of that. <<
It helps, at least.
>> Money worked really well to ease the problems of barter, like- what if I want apples, and can offer yarn, but the apple vendor doesn't want yarn but wants a knife. It gets unwieldy pretty fast! However, the PLUS is that no one gets to siphon off part of the value in each transaction. <<
True. There are barter exchanges, but they are taxed in cash.
>> Hmm. I may have an essay here... <<
Good idea.