My thoughts? Oh for haven's sake, it's science. If the results are valid, they should be replicable. So try to replicate them, preferably with a team of scientists who don't already have a strong opinion about whether or not cell phones are safe and will therefore take a "let's see what happens when we do this" approach.
Faking a study is bad. It's also sadly common. Sometimes it can be more-or-less proven with contextual evidence. But the best way to demolish someone's nonsensical study is to do another one using real science. I'd like to see more data on this topic, and I'd like it to be science rather than propaganda in either direction.
September 6 2008, 17:32:07 UTC 12 years ago
Sometimes it was just poor methodology, with some articles I read when researching studies on botanically-based drugs (marijuana, the cactus thing, the opium poppy, etc). That, or misinterpretation of the data, or other possibly unintentional errors were rather common among the articles we covered in the one class I had. But sadly there are a lot of corrupt scientists out there who are willing to botch results for some extra coin.
Too true!
September 7 2008, 01:13:49 UTC 12 years ago
Re: Too true!
September 7 2008, 01:36:32 UTC 12 years ago
I forget the details but I think you know what I mean.