But it's more than just fun; it's food for thought. The original poem was almost all dialog, with just a few bits of framing and other description that's now rendered visually. It isn't a poem anymore, per se, but the poem is still in there. The cadence and shaping of free verse remains, hidden, within the frame of poem-text-become-comic-script. Somehow those visuals were available for an artist to tap, and they're quite close to my original conceptualization, allowing room for individual interpretation -- some of the renderings are things I'd never have thought of -- but the interaction between writer and artist is also there, between the lines.
I've long said that the one form of writing I don't do is script. I tried it a few times and hated it. But this was cool. I always love seeing my work illustrated. Somehow, though, this is different. I think it's because in graphic format, the art carries half the storytelling weight and the text carries the other half. It has me thinking, maybe I could do this again. So now I'm kind of keeping my eye out for little projects on the script side. I haven't written much that's heavy enough on dialog and light enough on description that it might translate over, but there's some. And who knows, maybe sometime I'll try writing straight-up script.
You never know what will turn out not to be impossible after all.
"The Engineer In His Cups"?
August 23 2008, 15:36:44 UTC 12 years ago
Re: "The Engineer In His Cups"?
August 23 2008, 16:07:40 UTC 12 years ago
August 23 2008, 16:22:02 UTC 12 years ago