Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

Writing Emotions

 [personal profile] kaz  has an interesting post about writing emotions as expressions and body language, while being autistic and not perceiving those the same way neurotypical people do.
Tags: how to, networking, reading, writing
Subscribe

Recent Posts from This Journal

  • Community Building Tip: Outdoor Movies

    For my current set of tips, I'm using the list " 101 Small Ways You Can Improve Your City. 79. Screen a movie outdoors. An impromptu movie…

  • Photographs

    I took some pictures of my yard today. Read about what makes a good wildlife yard and Fieldhaven as habitat. The larger brush pile is still…

  • Birdfeeding

    Today is partly sunny and delightfully mild. I fed the birds. I've seen a small flock of house finches and a few sparrows. I walked around the yard…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 4 comments
Hmm. Neurotypical. I like...
Glad I could help. The counterpoint is neurovariant, which is most often used for the autistic spectrum, but is also useful for a wide range of other mindtypes outside the majority one.
On an oblique and somewhat vaguely related note...

When describing things like race, gender, religion, etc., there seem to be three broad/rough categories of words. But I can only think of a descriptor for one of them, have no descriptor for the middle set, and the positive set seems ill served by calling those words PC.

To wit:

Pejorative set: (in the case of a Jewish person) kike

Middle set: these are words/phrases that seem neutral, but are used by people who are missing the mark, but not through lack of trying - e.g. referring to a non-white person as 'coloured', or a person of African descent as a 'negro'.

PC set: African-American, Chinese-Canadian, etc.

My primary curiosity surrounds the middle set of words. The ones used by people, not in any deliberate pejorative or derogatory fashion, but words which, nonetheless, can be extremely offensive in the right (or wrong) context, or when taken to be offensive by someone who is of a mind to be offended.

Thoughts?

I've seen that pattern, yes. There's a tendency for all words associated with a disadvantaged group to become more pejorative over time. So then new words are made up and added to the top of the stack.