Folks, this is not of the good. People can't help being who and what they are. Picking on them because you don't like, or don't believe, what they are is mean. If you're an unusual person yourself, you KNOW it's mean because people do it to you and you don't like it. So don't do that to other people, even if you think what they are is wrong or stupid. As long as they're not harming anyone, you don't have grounds to bother them. It's not even any of your business, any more than what you are is the business of people who pick on you.
Mind your own business. Don't act like a dick. Be gentle with people's selves.
August 8 2013, 13:21:17 UTC 7 years ago
The funny thing is, most Mormons I know, I like. The heirarchy? I'd say they can go straight to hell, but one of the bits I carried over from my previous theology is that one's relationship with deity, be it Heaven or Hell, is both *present*, and yet to be... so they're already there.
</rant>
Wheaton's law should be enforced universally. Don't be a dick. I think if we could get that far in a society, the need for *having* to be gentle would be a lot less. Not that one shouldn't be gentle anyway! but it's an acquired skill... First do no harm....
(but take no shit!)
Yes...
August 8 2013, 19:16:10 UTC 7 years ago
Same here. I also like the option of polyfamilies, although I point out that even Christian privilege has its limits: the Mormons are treated as second-class citizens because they practice a different form of marriage which the state refuses to acknowledge.
Re: Yes...
August 8 2013, 20:14:33 UTC 7 years ago
I too think poly should be an option, regardless of one's creed.... but sadly I think that's gonna be a while.
The Mormons were *always* treated as second class; technically from both Catholic and mainstream Protestant viewpoints they're heretics, what with the book of Mormon... And then there's this having more than one wife in a house? Well, that's not FAIR! If we can only have one, you can only have one!
*sigh* The irony is that this country was founded by people who were themselves oppressed... obviously they never bothered breaking the cycle... and neither did anyone else.
Re: Yes...
August 8 2013, 20:19:40 UTC 7 years ago
It's still quite widely practiced; not all branches of Mormonism gave it up.
>> I too think poly should be an option, regardless of one's creed.... but sadly I think that's gonna be a while. <<
Alas.
>> *sigh* The irony is that this country was founded by people who were themselves oppressed... obviously they never bothered breaking the cycle... and neither did anyone else. <<
Almost nobody, after escaping from oppression, can resist the temptation to turn around and abuse someone else.
Re: Yes...
August 9 2013, 01:10:21 UTC 7 years ago
It still freaks me out how Christians don't consider Mormons to be Christian. Look, they believe that Jesus was a god, they celebrate Christian holidays, sure seems like Christians to me.
Re: Yes...
August 9 2013, 01:59:26 UTC 7 years ago
Yes, that matches my observation. Some of them have excellent family skills, far above average for this country. And then there are the ones who think it's okay to marry little girls.
>> It still freaks me out how Christians don't consider Mormons to be Christian. Look, they believe that Jesus was a god, they celebrate Christian holidays, sure seems like Christians to me. <<
Yes, Jesus Christ is the linchpin of the Christian religion. Funny how Christians don't get that. But they've spent 2000 years murdering and oppressing each other over the "right" way to worship him, and the Mormons are actually far from the loopiest version to come along.
August 8 2013, 21:45:44 UTC 7 years ago
I don't know WHY that person was so upset that people believed things they didn't, but GODDAMN.
--Rogan
O_O
August 9 2013, 09:08:42 UTC 7 years ago
That's just bizarre. Maybe people want to have a particular fight, and just wander around looking for a place to plunk it down?
>> I don't know WHY that person was so upset that people believed things they didn't, but GODDAMN. <<
If it's in your space, step on it and put it out before it starts a flamewar. If it's not in your space, you can just walk away. That falls into the category of shit up with which I will not put.
Re: O_O
August 13 2013, 13:25:20 UTC 7 years ago
That's been my experience. It happens with a lot of trolls, too: they deliberately are looking to start a fire, and anywhere that seems reactive will do. And while the first response to a flamewar might be "don't leave brimstone lying around", a LOT of things will burn, especially as the fires get hotter -- even concrete when it starts flaking into powder.
Re: O_O
August 13 2013, 23:26:16 UTC 7 years ago
August 9 2013, 01:26:23 UTC 7 years ago
We're all so indoctrinated though that there has to be an unquestionable objective reality that we bring it into our spiritual/personal whatever tho. And that's before you go wandering into the way perspective is so damn hard to have given what most of us grow up with. It's taken me freaking decades to get this far.
Well...
August 9 2013, 01:50:11 UTC 7 years ago
I'm an empiricist and a pragmatist. If model "Robin = man" produces less accurate results and "Robin = woman" produces more accurate results, then I will treat Robin as a woman. If "Jane thinks of herself as a reincarnation of Jane from the Tarzan cycle" makes it easier for me to figure out what she needs and how she will act, then it is more useful to me than ignoring it and treating her as someone else.
>> We're all so indoctrinated though that there has to be an unquestionable objective reality that we bring it into our spiritual/personal whatever tho. <<
Objective reality is that the entire universe is made of infinitesimal bits whizzing around and pretending they are solid. This is not very useful unless you are doing quantum mechanics or magic, and mentioning either half of that practice to the other just makes people wibble. For day to day purposes, one must deal in some layer of practical illusion. We treat the chair as solid because it is pretending very hard to be solid, and we can sit upon it, so the subjective illusion of solidity is more useful than the objective knowledge that most of what we perceive as a chair isn't really there. Objective reality is that souls are patterns of energy bound up with a bunch of whizzing bits. Subjective reality is that people have feelings and beliefs, and will be hurt if you pick on them, so don't.
August 9 2013, 02:28:57 UTC 7 years ago
You're welcome!
August 9 2013, 02:36:15 UTC 7 years ago