I think this is a bad idea, because elder care requires skills that not everyone has or can learn. That's a practical limitation, aside from moral issues. Mandating a specific care arrangement like this means trapping a lot of elders with inadequate care. It also traps adult offspring in a situation they may be wholly unfit for. This can lead to problems such as murder, suicide, abandonment, neglect, depression, etc. which already plague elders and their caregivers.
Surely senior citizens need to be supported if they can no longer meet all their own needs. Ideally, family will take on at least some of that. But it doesn't always work that way, and people need flexible options so as not to create human wreckage unnecessarily.
July 15 2013, 14:15:39 UTC 7 years ago
Thank you!
July 15 2013, 18:47:04 UTC 7 years ago
One thing that bothers me is the "have your cake and eat it too" approach that society takes more often these days. When people need something and take alternative approaches to get it, making their own decisions, there's a charge of "practicing medicine without a license." But when they're pressured or forced to care for themselves or family members, somehow that ceases to apply -- even though the technical level of care demanded of them is often far greater.
Deleted comment
Yes...
July 15 2013, 18:37:40 UTC 7 years ago
Basically, if people are forced to do work they can't refuse, that is slavery and it is not okay.
July 24 2013, 20:31:13 UTC 7 years ago