Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

Stacking vs. Not Stacking

Here's an interesting essay about why not to stack atypical character traits.  This is sometimes referred to as Twofer Token Minority.  It's particularly pesky when they're sidekicks instead of main characters.

The thing is ... there are people with multiple minority traits.  There are gay Asians.  There are autistic Pagans.  There are poor black lesbians in wheelchairs.  And those people sometimes feel overlooked because the stacking effect can change their experiences so much that a single-trait character doesn't feel much like them.  I've read essays upholding this end of the debate but couldn't find one to use as an example here.

My stance is that I write characters as they need to be.  I have a lot of characters who are female/other trait because roughly half of humanity is female.  Other combinations are less common but also appear.  Brelig is a normal-sized Duurludirj man (which we'd consider a dwarf) and missing one hand.  Maryam Smith is African-British, genderqueer, duoclass, and of illegitimate birth.  I'm more likely to focus on minority protagonists than to use them as filler, something my audience seems to enjoy if you look over what's been published.  I don't tend to write a lot of straight white Christian men, though, so the core of the mainstream doesn't get a lot of traffic from me.  Meh.  

Also, if I haven't specified a trait in canon, yes it could  fall outside the mainstream.  Characters have done this to me often enough, and my cultural awareness is diverse enough, that there's no permanent default.  They may pop out an uncommon religion or sexual orientation or invisible handicap or whatnot, and they may do that after two stories or six poems or twenty years.  I'm more likely to mention physical features such as skin tone and gender up front, because they're noticeable points of diversity.  But I've also had characters refuse to reveal their sex/gender, and not just the ones for whom "I'm not telling" is  their gender.

I'm interested in other people's perspectives on the matter of single vs. stacked traits.
Tags: discussion, networking, reading, writing
Subscribe

Recent Posts from This Journal

  • Community Building Tip: Outdoor Movies

    For my current set of tips, I'm using the list " 101 Small Ways You Can Improve Your City. 79. Screen a movie outdoors. An impromptu movie…

  • Photographs

    I took some pictures of my yard today. Read about what makes a good wildlife yard and Fieldhaven as habitat. The larger brush pile is still…

  • Birdfeeding

    Today is partly sunny and delightfully mild. I fed the birds. I've seen a small flock of house finches and a few sparrows. I walked around the yard…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 38 comments
Well, some of those could go together by cause and effect.

Being crippled traditionallly results in poverty: 'crippled beggar' is a stereotype -- or are you trying to avoid stereotypes?

Being in a persecuted minority can result in bearing scars from a beating, or having suffered some permanent injury -- and either the minority status or the injury can result in poverty.

Or, poverty can result in permanent injury -- from having to work in an unsafe job, travel in an unsafe manner, etc, or from lacking the money for proper medical treatment.

And any of these factors can lead the victim to become an activist for that issue -- which may put them in another persecuted group.
>> Well, some of those could go together by cause and effect. <<

That's an excellent point, thank you.

>> Being crippled traditionally results in poverty: 'crippled beggar' is a stereotype -- or are you trying to avoid stereotypes? <<

I prefer to avoid stereotypes in my writing. However, trends are different; a handicap does pose a barrier to self-support, which may be minor in one culture and devastating in another, even for the same handicap. Many cultures do a crummy job of integrating people with handicaps, which results in many of them being poor. I'd say, if you throw in a crippled beggar as a bit part without thinking, that's a stereotype; but if you pay attention to why this is going on, how society responds to people with handicaps and without money, then it's social commentary.
There are poor black lesbians in wheelchairs. And those people sometimes feel overlooked because the stacking effect can change their experiences so much that a single-trait character doesn't feel much like them.

Definitely true for me. I can't identify with a LOT of gay/trans protagonists, because being gay or trans is their Big Thing, and I can't identify with that. I was furious when I found out I was gay... mostly because I was dealing with the multiplicity and my gender at the same time, and I was REALLY FUCKING TIRED of being "special." Say what you will about the quality of 'Set This House in Order,' I found it wonderful to see a multi that was trans and just couldn't care, because they had so much other shit going down.

Multi representation on its own is awful. Hell, yesterday, I involuntarily bellowed, "SON OF A BITCH," while watching Batman with friends because goddammit, the villain was multiple, with an evil alter and Jekyll/Hyde set-up. THANKS GUYS. I just avoid all multi work now, because I know I will just get mad, and anyway, good luck seeing any multis who aren't white, predominantly straight, and evil.

--Rogan
Have you read C. S. Friedman's This Alien Shore? One of its two protagonists is multiple, the other is a high-functioning autistic, and as far as I can tell they're both portrayed very positively. There are several illustrations of how having alters with different skillsets can be useful in dire circumstances (but first they have to learn how to work together).
I badly need to read that one; I recall having it recommended to me by another system! It seems that my local library actually has it. Looks like I know what I'm reading after I finish the current batch of books! (So far, my favorite multi book has been Bruce Coville's Aliens Stole My Body, of all things.)
I haven't heard of Aliens Stole My Body. Sounds like quite an adventure.

However, it reminds me of another quasi-multiple series. Ukiah Oregon is an alien, and he has been physically separated into different people, some but not all of which later rejoin. This series has some of the most fascinating explorations of consciousness and identity that I've ever read. Oh, and his human mother was Cayuse so he is not white. And I think you would appreciate what his other-self Atticus has done to his sexuality in the last book.

Another good example: Aang in Avatar has memory of his past lives, who sometimes appear as spirits he can talk with. This is not exactly the same as single-lifetime multiple personality, but touches on many of the same motifs as experienced by people whose alters are walk-ins or soul groups. And as the whole fandom roared over miscast movie, Aang ain't white.

If I were still going to cons, I'd have the beginnings of a panel rec-reading list at this point.

Re: Ooo...

siege

8 years ago

Re: Ooo...

ysabetwordsmith

8 years ago

Re: Ooo...

lb_lee

8 years ago

Re: Ooo...

ysabetwordsmith

8 years ago

That's my benchmark for best multiple in fiction, yes. And the alters are well rendered as having different sexes and shapes. I think one of them is black (the body being white and strawberry blond). The backstory is traumatic cleavage, but the current plot is good.

Oh, another one: Mark Vorkosigan and his Black Gang. They're all male but totally different personalities and abilities. Heck, even Miles Vorkosigan has an alter, Admiral Naismith; more aspected than true multiple like Mark, but still close. Good family dynamics throughout the Vorkosigan series.

Re: Yes...

lb_lee

8 years ago

Re: Yes...

ysabetwordsmith

8 years ago

>> I can't identify with a LOT of gay/trans protagonists, because being gay or trans is their Big Thing, and I can't identify with that. <<

I've had people tell me I couldn't possibly be genderqueer, because it hasn't ruined my life. For fucksake my current body is not my preferred size, shape, sex, color, or species; but I am a shapeshifter and can cope with variations. I'm supposed to wig out over one particular divergence? WTF, no. It's an aspect of my personality but not the most salient one.

>> I was furious when I found out I was gay... mostly because I was dealing with the multiplicity and my gender at the same time, and I was REALLY FUCKING TIRED of being "special." >>

Ouch. That's gotta suck.

>> Say what you will about the quality of 'Set This House in Order,' I found it wonderful to see a multi that was trans and just couldn't care, because they had so much other shit going down. <<

*nod* I've noticed that effect, where there's so much happening that some of it just isn't as important to the person compared to something else that is seriously on fire. But to a different person with only that one thing rocking their boat, it might seem like a much bigger deal.

>> Multi representation on its own is awful. <<

Agreed. This often bothers me in literature/entertainment.

>> Hell, yesterday, I involuntarily bellowed, "SON OF A BITCH," while watching Batman with friends because goddammit, the villain was multiple, with an evil alter and Jekyll/Hyde set-up. THANKS GUYS. <<

0_o That sounds full of FAIL.


>> I just avoid all multi work now, because I know I will just get mad, and anyway, good luck seeing any multis who aren't white, predominantly straight, and evil. <<

I'm sorry to hear that. I feel that this is an area that really needs more representation, and you know a lot about it, and I value your input on what's gone wrong so that those things can be fixed.

One of my oldest characters has an aspected personality, spanning different genders and even cultures. The bandit-self is a horse. And absolutely none of this shows unless you know exactly what to look for or are told outright, because this is the sanest person I've ever met. Except that outclan think everyone from Waterjewel is crazy by dint of being too sane to make sense to those who are differently civilized.

I'm prone to writing shapeshifters as multiples, because of how body influences thought: if you are sometimes human and sometimes a wolf, you will necessarily interact differently. It's kind of like how thinking in a different language changes your thought patterns.

I'm open to the idea of writing more characters who are multiples, if anyone wants to prompt in that direction.

siege

June 12 2013, 22:32:59 UTC 8 years ago Edited:  June 12 2013, 22:33:12 UTC

because goddammit, the villain was multiple, with an evil alter and Jekyll/Hyde set-up

Two-Face always was the worst kind of cliche. At least most Batman villains were characters and not just stereotypes.
Oh, poor Harvey. The whole time I was watching Batman: the Animated Series, I was going, "Guys, GUYS! There are so much better ways of fair system governance than random chance! C'mere, sit down, let me explain to you the concept of a system contract..." You can tell I've been Multi Dear Abby for teenagers on DeviantArt for too long.

I actually felt deep sympathy for Big Bad Harv during the Two-Face two-parter. I still feel like if those poor bastards had gotten their hands on some proper care and system governance, the whole debacle could've been avoided, they would've turned out okay, and then Gotham would've had a multi... er, whatever public office Harvey Dent was going for. Maybe they could've even fought for revamping the Gotham mental health system, so Arkham Asylum could actually be competent, and clean up Gotham's streets THAT way.

AND WOULDN'T THAT HAVE BEEN AWESOME.

--Rogan

Thoughts

ysabetwordsmith

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

lb_lee

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

ysabetwordsmith

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

lb_lee

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

siege

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

ysabetwordsmith

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

lb_lee

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

ysabetwordsmith

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

lb_lee

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

ysabetwordsmith

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

ysabetwordsmith

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

chordatesrock

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

lb_lee

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

chordatesrock

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

lb_lee

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

chordatesrock

8 years ago

Re: Thoughts

ysabetwordsmith

8 years ago

Almost too obvious to be mentioned, but in many cases the setting of a story will automatically suggest that the majority of the population is going to be of a different ethnicity (religion, native language etc.) than your other "typical character trait." Beyond that, mentioning characters whose, say, religious minority status makes them relevant to the plot (in the sense of dissatisfied with the current regime's treatment of minorities) will lead to a lot of "stacked" traits. Ditto characters who acquire physical disabilities over the course of the narrative.
>> Almost too obvious to be mentioned, but in many cases the setting of a story will automatically suggest that the majority of the population is going to be of a different ethnicity (religion, native language etc.) than your other "typical character trait." <<

Apparently that's not obvious. I mean, it is to me; that's how I usually write about diversity. I put it in the foundation. But then other writers act like I'm doing something weird. The standard approach seems to be picking out traited characters one at a time and writing a story "about" their salient trait(s). Sometimes I assemble a team, and if I do that in any kind of multicultural setting, I'll aim for a diverse team; and I generally tend to have a mix if the setting allows for it. But I really like settings where the defaults differ from where I happen to live.

>> Beyond that, mentioning characters whose, say, religious minority status makes them relevant to the plot (in the sense of dissatisfied with the current regime's treatment of minorities) will lead to a lot of "stacked" traits. Ditto characters who acquire physical disabilities over the course of the narrative. <<

Those are both true. And some other folks pointed out that certain traits lead to others, like disability and poverty.
I expect that this is a question of write what you can handle, write what the reader can handle. Needless to say, plenty of people are stacked, and thus know how to juggle more than those not called to deliver.

(Really, being white male middle-class middle-brow able-bodied straight is improbable, right? ;)
>> I expect that this is a question of write what you can handle, write what the reader can handle. Needless to say, plenty of people are stacked, and thus know how to juggle more than those not called to deliver. <<

Also, write what the story needs.

>> (Really, being white male middle-class middle-brow able-bodied straight is improbable, right? ;) <<

Yes, hitting ALL the approved categories is uncommon.
Also, write what the story needs.

Truth. Really, it can be a simple and as hard as letting characters be themselves. And that requires knowing you aren't the only valid way of being.

It can also mean finding the truth instead of the tropes, and rewriting bad tape. I mostly don't read professional romance, but I sure read a lot of romantic slash.

Recent Posts from This Journal

  • Community Building Tip: Outdoor Movies

    For my current set of tips, I'm using the list " 101 Small Ways You Can Improve Your City. 79. Screen a movie outdoors. An impromptu movie…

  • Photographs

    I took some pictures of my yard today. Read about what makes a good wildlife yard and Fieldhaven as habitat. The larger brush pile is still…

  • Birdfeeding

    Today is partly sunny and delightfully mild. I fed the birds. I've seen a small flock of house finches and a few sparrows. I walked around the yard…