The thing is ... there are people with multiple minority traits. There are gay Asians. There are autistic Pagans. There are poor black lesbians in wheelchairs. And those people sometimes feel overlooked because the stacking effect can change their experiences so much that a single-trait character doesn't feel much like them. I've read essays upholding this end of the debate but couldn't find one to use as an example here.
My stance is that I write characters as they need to be. I have a lot of characters who are female/other trait because roughly half of humanity is female. Other combinations are less common but also appear. Brelig is a normal-sized Duurludirj man (which we'd consider a dwarf) and missing one hand. Maryam Smith is African-British, genderqueer, duoclass, and of illegitimate birth. I'm more likely to focus on minority protagonists than to use them as filler, something my audience seems to enjoy if you look over what's been published. I don't tend to write a lot of straight white Christian men, though, so the core of the mainstream doesn't get a lot of traffic from me. Meh.
Also, if I haven't specified a trait in canon, yes it could fall outside the mainstream. Characters have done this to me often enough, and my cultural awareness is diverse enough, that there's no permanent default. They may pop out an uncommon religion or sexual orientation or invisible handicap or whatnot, and they may do that after two stories or six poems or twenty years. I'm more likely to mention physical features such as skin tone and gender up front, because they're noticeable points of diversity. But I've also had characters refuse to reveal their sex/gender, and not just the ones for whom "I'm not telling" is their gender.
I'm interested in other people's perspectives on the matter of single vs. stacked traits.
June 12 2013, 15:02:32 UTC 8 years ago
Being crippled traditionallly results in poverty: 'crippled beggar' is a stereotype -- or are you trying to avoid stereotypes?
Being in a persecuted minority can result in bearing scars from a beating, or having suffered some permanent injury -- and either the minority status or the injury can result in poverty.
Or, poverty can result in permanent injury -- from having to work in an unsafe job, travel in an unsafe manner, etc, or from lacking the money for proper medical treatment.
And any of these factors can lead the victim to become an activist for that issue -- which may put them in another persecuted group.
Yes...
June 12 2013, 23:14:59 UTC 8 years ago
That's an excellent point, thank you.
>> Being crippled traditionally results in poverty: 'crippled beggar' is a stereotype -- or are you trying to avoid stereotypes? <<
I prefer to avoid stereotypes in my writing. However, trends are different; a handicap does pose a barrier to self-support, which may be minor in one culture and devastating in another, even for the same handicap. Many cultures do a crummy job of integrating people with handicaps, which results in many of them being poor. I'd say, if you throw in a crippled beggar as a bit part without thinking, that's a stereotype; but if you pay attention to why this is going on, how society responds to people with handicaps and without money, then it's social commentary.
June 12 2013, 17:39:15 UTC 8 years ago
Definitely true for me. I can't identify with a LOT of gay/trans protagonists, because being gay or trans is their Big Thing, and I can't identify with that. I was furious when I found out I was gay... mostly because I was dealing with the multiplicity and my gender at the same time, and I was REALLY FUCKING TIRED of being "special." Say what you will about the quality of 'Set This House in Order,' I found it wonderful to see a multi that was trans and just couldn't care, because they had so much other shit going down.
Multi representation on its own is awful. Hell, yesterday, I involuntarily bellowed, "SON OF A BITCH," while watching Batman with friends because goddammit, the villain was multiple, with an evil alter and Jekyll/Hyde set-up. THANKS GUYS. I just avoid all multi work now, because I know I will just get mad, and anyway, good luck seeing any multis who aren't white, predominantly straight, and evil.
--Rogan
June 12 2013, 18:53:48 UTC 8 years ago
June 12 2013, 21:11:40 UTC 8 years ago
Ooo...
June 12 2013, 21:41:42 UTC 8 years ago
However, it reminds me of another quasi-multiple series. Ukiah Oregon is an alien, and he has been physically separated into different people, some but not all of which later rejoin. This series has some of the most fascinating explorations of consciousness and identity that I've ever read. Oh, and his human mother was Cayuse so he is not white. And I think you would appreciate what his other-self Atticus has done to his sexuality in the last book.
Another good example: Aang in Avatar has memory of his past lives, who sometimes appear as spirits he can talk with. This is not exactly the same as single-lifetime multiple personality, but touches on many of the same motifs as experienced by people whose alters are walk-ins or soul groups. And as the whole fandom roared over miscast movie, Aang ain't white.
If I were still going to cons, I'd have the beginnings of a panel rec-reading list at this point.
Re: Ooo...
8 years ago
Re: Ooo...
8 years ago
Re: Ooo...
8 years ago
Re: Ooo...
8 years ago
Yes...
June 12 2013, 21:13:12 UTC 8 years ago
Oh, another one: Mark Vorkosigan and his Black Gang. They're all male but totally different personalities and abilities. Heck, even Miles Vorkosigan has an alter, Admiral Naismith; more aspected than true multiple like Mark, but still close. Good family dynamics throughout the Vorkosigan series.
Re: Yes...
8 years ago
Re: Yes...
8 years ago
Thoughts
June 12 2013, 21:09:07 UTC 8 years ago
I've had people tell me I couldn't possibly be genderqueer, because it hasn't ruined my life. For fucksake my current body is not my preferred size, shape, sex, color, or species; but I am a shapeshifter and can cope with variations. I'm supposed to wig out over one particular divergence? WTF, no. It's an aspect of my personality but not the most salient one.
>> I was furious when I found out I was gay... mostly because I was dealing with the multiplicity and my gender at the same time, and I was REALLY FUCKING TIRED of being "special." >>
Ouch. That's gotta suck.
>> Say what you will about the quality of 'Set This House in Order,' I found it wonderful to see a multi that was trans and just couldn't care, because they had so much other shit going down. <<
*nod* I've noticed that effect, where there's so much happening that some of it just isn't as important to the person compared to something else that is seriously on fire. But to a different person with only that one thing rocking their boat, it might seem like a much bigger deal.
>> Multi representation on its own is awful. <<
Agreed. This often bothers me in literature/entertainment.
>> Hell, yesterday, I involuntarily bellowed, "SON OF A BITCH," while watching Batman with friends because goddammit, the villain was multiple, with an evil alter and Jekyll/Hyde set-up. THANKS GUYS. <<
0_o That sounds full of FAIL.
>> I just avoid all multi work now, because I know I will just get mad, and anyway, good luck seeing any multis who aren't white, predominantly straight, and evil. <<
I'm sorry to hear that. I feel that this is an area that really needs more representation, and you know a lot about it, and I value your input on what's gone wrong so that those things can be fixed.
One of my oldest characters has an aspected personality, spanning different genders and even cultures. The bandit-self is a horse. And absolutely none of this shows unless you know exactly what to look for or are told outright, because this is the sanest person I've ever met. Except that outclan think everyone from Waterjewel is crazy by dint of being too sane to make sense to those who are differently civilized.
I'm prone to writing shapeshifters as multiples, because of how body influences thought: if you are sometimes human and sometimes a wolf, you will necessarily interact differently. It's kind of like how thinking in a different language changes your thought patterns.
I'm open to the idea of writing more characters who are multiples, if anyone wants to prompt in that direction.
June 12 2013, 22:32:59 UTC 8 years ago Edited: June 12 2013, 22:33:12 UTC
Two-Face always was the worst kind of cliche. At least most Batman villains were characters and not just stereotypes.
June 13 2013, 01:13:45 UTC 8 years ago
I actually felt deep sympathy for Big Bad Harv during the Two-Face two-parter. I still feel like if those poor bastards had gotten their hands on some proper care and system governance, the whole debacle could've been avoided, they would've turned out okay, and then Gotham would've had a multi... er, whatever public office Harvey Dent was going for. Maybe they could've even fought for revamping the Gotham mental health system, so Arkham Asylum could actually be competent, and clean up Gotham's streets THAT way.
AND WOULDN'T THAT HAVE BEEN AWESOME.
--Rogan
Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
Re: Thoughts
8 years ago
June 25 2013, 03:28:14 UTC 8 years ago
Thoughts
June 25 2013, 04:03:27 UTC 8 years ago
Apparently that's not obvious. I mean, it is to me; that's how I usually write about diversity. I put it in the foundation. But then other writers act like I'm doing something weird. The standard approach seems to be picking out traited characters one at a time and writing a story "about" their salient trait(s). Sometimes I assemble a team, and if I do that in any kind of multicultural setting, I'll aim for a diverse team; and I generally tend to have a mix if the setting allows for it. But I really like settings where the defaults differ from where I happen to live.
>> Beyond that, mentioning characters whose, say, religious minority status makes them relevant to the plot (in the sense of dissatisfied with the current regime's treatment of minorities) will lead to a lot of "stacked" traits. Ditto characters who acquire physical disabilities over the course of the narrative. <<
Those are both true. And some other folks pointed out that certain traits lead to others, like disability and poverty.
March 6 2014, 21:06:29 UTC 7 years ago
(Really, being white male middle-class middle-brow able-bodied straight is improbable, right? ;)
Yes...
March 6 2014, 21:29:19 UTC 7 years ago
Also, write what the story needs.
>> (Really, being white male middle-class middle-brow able-bodied straight is improbable, right? ;) <<
Yes, hitting ALL the approved categories is uncommon.
Re: Yes...
March 7 2014, 05:09:29 UTC 7 years ago
Truth. Really, it can be a simple and as hard as letting characters be themselves. And that requires knowing you aren't the only valid way of being.
It can also mean finding the truth instead of the tropes, and rewriting bad tape. I mostly don't read professional romance, but I sure read a lot of romantic slash.