... cancer takes a while to develop.
Cellphone Safety Tips
... cancer takes a while to develop.
-
Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21
Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…
-
Bingo
I have made bingo down the B, G, and O columns of my 6-1-21 card for the Cottoncandy Bingo fest. I also have one extra fill. B1 (caretaking) --…
-
Poetry Fishbowl on Tuesday, July 6
This is an advance announcement for the Tuesday, July 6, 2021 Poetry Fishbowl. This time the theme will be "Reality is stranger than fiction." I'll…
July 28 2008, 06:02:17 UTC 12 years ago
This http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2008/07/oh_no_my_cell_phones_going_to_kill_me.php
is a good criticism of the weakness of the claim.
July 28 2008, 13:08:45 UTC 12 years ago
Although, my Motorola phone did come with instructions to minimise the radiation you *do* receive, since there are concerns that it MAY be a health risk.
July 29 2008, 06:36:28 UTC 12 years ago
Concerns about the general amount of electromagnetic radiation, especially in cities or near cell phone towers, have been slowly rising for some time. It has been somewhat linked with things like insomnia and nervous disorders. One big obstacle to pinpointing causes of cancer and other environmental ailments in humans is that we've sullied the planet so thoroughly with so many different things that it's extremely hard to weed them all out for a controlled analysis of just one.
Also bear in mind that cigarettes were suspected of causing cancer long before it was hard-proven, let alone before anything was actually done about it. The tobacco companies did everything they could to delay and distort that information; they still do as much as they can get away with. They don't mind their products killing people.
Cell phone companies, unsurprisingly, have balked at the idea their products might be harmful or that anything should be done to shield the radiation away from users. One fairly obvious improvement would be line the ear-side of the phone with a shielding substance so that the radiation would mainly exit the back.
Let's just say I like to watch science in action, from the beginning, and I keep a wary eye on things humanity didn't evolve to handle.
July 29 2008, 06:58:54 UTC 12 years ago
Besides, I'm getting hit right now with enough radiation from two computers, 3 monitors, a printer and a stereo to probably make a cell phone in use seem negligable. ;)
BTW, standards in Europe and Canada tend to be higher than those of the US, so if you don't want to trust US standards, see how it pans out in other countries. I mean, it's to the point that I was once told condoms in Canada are stronger than ones in the US (mind you, I was probably told this maybe 10-15 years ago it could be diff these days).
Honestly, I'm not worried about my cell phone because I don't have it on me most of the time. I have it mostly in case I need it, and so I have it should I get mugged or fall and break my ankle or something. That only works if I remember to take it with me when I leave the apartment, but it's a good theory. ;)
The people who definitely need to know are those who seem to have the phone permanently attached to their ear. I really don't understand a need to be on the phone with someone all the time. When I was a kid some adults used the term "cauliflower ear" to describe what can happen if you use the phone too much. Maybe we should bring that urban myth back. ;)
July 29 2008, 07:22:21 UTC 12 years ago
The fact that we're bombarded by lots of electromagnetic radiation does not make it safe. A lot of health problems are skyrocketing, and some of that might be due to the huge spike in radiation. If so, adding even more is not a great idea. There are studies that lean that way and others that don't; no proof yet, but suspicions.
July 29 2008, 17:19:32 UTC 12 years ago
I'm sort of neutral on the electromagnetism radiation for now until there's sufficient evidence one way or the other. I haven't read the studies that have been done, but it's possible there are some on either side that weren't done well. Unfortunately it's too early to say, there is not a way to know the long term effects without long-term exposure, and society isn't going to be willing to put a technology on hold until they know for certain if it's okay. :/ It's being between a rock and a hard place. Best we can do is look after ourselves and our families.
July 28 2008, 15:09:22 UTC 12 years ago