Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

Stealing Our Free Time

This article explains how "do it yourself" services force consumers to do things that employees are customarily paid for doing. This devours everyone's free time -- if you think you have less of it, you're right, because you're now stuck wasting your time on things that other people used to do for you. And some of those things were done better and faster and safter by trained employees. Sometimes the do it yourself model is better, but often it isn't.
Tags: economics
Subscribe

  • Today's Smoothie

    Today we made a smoothie with: 1 cup almond milk 1 cup Brown Cow vanilla yogurt 1 banana 1/2 cup fresh mulberries 1/2 cup ice This is bright purple…

  • Community Refrigerators

    Meet the Freedge, a source of free perishables. Community refrigerators are the newest form of Little Free Pantry, skyrocketing in popularity over…

  • Poetry Fishbowl Report for June 1, 2021

    This month's theme was "I never thought I'd have to say that." I wrote from 1:30 PM to 5:45 AM, so about 14 hours 15 minutes, allowing for…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 6 comments
My friends think it's odd that I have always refused to use self checkouts.

My reasoning: I used to work at a k-mart at the check out counter, and every one of those machines is an entry-level job that someone doesn't have. If I give a store my money, somebody better be checking me out. Otherwise, I may as well shop at my computer.

The best one was a home-improvement store that 'let' you cut you own boards. I believe that requires an attendant, now...
I've thought about that, too. On the one hand, I genuinely like a lot of self-service things. I prefer to use self-check outs. They're quicker and, especially for small orders, easier. I also greatly prefer automated phone systems and/or online systems to speaking to a person. It's just easier. On the other hand, there are jobs being lost. Of course, when industrialization came about, there were a lot of jobs lost, too. And the transition was extremely brutal.

I think, ultimately, the "Automation Revolution" will prove as significant, in both good and bad ways, as the Industrial Revolution. A century from now, our descendants may look back at the 40-hour work week and be shocked that people had to work so long. They'll be used to machines doing so many of the jobs that we pay people today to do. And they'll be machines that will be more efficient than today's relatively-primitive machines.
People aren't working fewer hours, though. They're working more hours at lower-paying jobs, often several jobs per person. Not only are jobs being lost, new jobs created are overwhelmingly inferior jobs: low pay, low and/or erratic hours, few or no benefits, etc. They are concentrated in retail/service fields, low in responsibility, respect, and interest.

What parent aspires for their children to be cashiers or table wipers? There's nothing dishonorable about the work, but it is not satisfying for very many people. It's okay for entry-level work, but long-term it tends to crush the intellect. That's not good: when people are overstressed and miserable, they get sick more and get into fights more. A healthy economy should have a good mix of easy and challenging jobs -- with as much safety and sanity as the job type can be made to contain.
People aren't working fewer hours yet. In the initial stages of the industrial revolution, working conditions were worse than pre-industrial, with harder work, too.

I'm not sure *what* an automated economy would look like (I have a few ideas; less specialization, I think, will be a part of it; people won't find themselves doing the same job every day for their whole working life, there'll be more flexibility) - but then, if you asked someone at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, they would have no idea what a fully industrialized economy would look like either. There were concerns over the loss of farming jobs, and many people believed that industrial jobs could never be as good as farm jobs.

I'm not saying things are getting better right now - they're not - or that things will improve very soon. It'll probably take decades to settle out. I hope we can find some way of cushioning the transition. But, ultimately, I think fighting against it will prove as short-sighted as the attempts made at various times and places to stop industrialization.
"I also greatly prefer automated phone systems and/or online systems to speaking to a person."

Sometimes yes; sometimes no.

I recently had occasion to order funeral flowers just barely 24 hours before the event. I combined online viewing of the 1-800-Flowers merchandise with phoning in the order to a live clerk so I could emphasize the short turnaround time. I was phoning on a Sunday-noon for a Monday-noon funeral, so I couldn't *just* pay the extra $5 for same-day delivery in the online order form.
She gets syndicated in my local newspaper. My husband pointed out the piece and I read it over breakfast.

There are things I'm willing to pay experts to do, and other things I'm perfectly capable of doing myself. Building a bookshelf and staining it, in order, for recent instance.

I generally prefer the do-it-yourself checkouts at grocery stores, because I bring my own canvas grocery bags and I have better control of what goes into each bag that way.