Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

Con Tips for Writers; Getting Someone's Attention

I found this interesting essay on how writers should behave at a science fiction convention.

However, this part caught my eye:

"When you cut in on someone, you don't stand in their line of sight and wait for them to decide to give you their attention. That's obnoxious and you're sending a signal you don't want to send."


One of my favorite con memories is of a Very Famous Author doing exactly that to me. It turns out that I'd done something earlier that impressed him enough that he tracked me down to talk with me. He found me deep in conversation (on the same topic, even) with a couple other people -- and he discreetly parked himself at the edge of my awareness and waited for me to notice him. I invited him into the conversation. This worked. I found the approach charming.

I've done it myself, and it works for me too, in the right context. You have to get the body language and the distance right: close enough to notice, but not crowding; patient rather than over-eager. It's more elegant and dignified than just butting in; and it's a recognized maneuver in academic and intellectual circles. It doesn't work in conversational football, where the accepted entrance maneuver is to spot the ball and tackle someone for it. (I can do that too. I'm also not averse to verbal hockey and am entirely capable of hitting someone in the nuts with the puck.) But I like the flow of conversational dance.

So I'm curious:
What method(s) do you prefer to use for entering a conversation that interests you?
What approach(es) do you like other people to use when they want to join a conversation with you?
Tags: networking, science fiction, writing
Subscribe

  • Fieldhaven as Habitat

    If you follow my posts on gardening, birdfeeding, and photos, then you know that I garden for wildlife. Looking at the YardMap parameters, here…

  • A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap

    Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…

  • Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21

    Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 27 comments
*muse* I notice there are variants of this approach that work in VR, also. The equivalent of "butting in" and the equivalent of sidling in sideways, politely. But I have yet to quantify the exact approaches.
The details intrigue me. Enough data -- especially from different observers and different contexts -- and it's possible to start mapping out the parameters.

Frex, the distance is crucial. If you're too far back, you won't be noticed. If you're too far forward, you're stepping on people's space the wrong way, and it's irritating. You want to just nudge the edge of their awareness.

Also from an energy perspective, different approaches vary a lot. You need a rounded energy for this approach. To cut in, you need a wedge; to tackle the verbal football, you have to sort of shove in and jump on top of someone.
I also think it depends upon how you do it. I've known people to lurk hoping someone will notice them. I've also known people to approach & wait for an appropriate break point to say "Excuse me..."

I have to agree with you though. I tend to think it's more polite to show patience in engaging someone in conversation.
Yes, "excuse me" is good -- especially if you have a need to get someone's attention: "Excuse me, Mr. Pro, but our panel starts in 5 minutes. Do you want to walk to the panel room with me and Ms. Copanelist?"
I've been friends with too many men, so I tend to cut into conversations both online and off. I don't do it rudely, I just wait until a natural pause in the discussion and add my own opinion or knowledge. If I get ignored at that point, I get the hint and go off to mind my own business elsewhere.

If I'm not sure if my input would be welcome (or if I'm feeling shy) I would probably do the same, only I would start off by saying "If you don't mind my saying..."
*nod* My masculine nature comes out very strongly in certain conversational situations. It's not possible to exclude me simply by ignoring me, if I'm determined to be involved in something. Men do not expect to be verbally tackled by a girl -- some of them will throw a fit, but the more common response is like, "Oh, you wanna play rough?" If you can play rough, you can play.

I learned these maneuvers in school, where boys get called on far more than girls. I'd give the teacher an opportunity to be fair, and if fairness wasn't forthcoming, I'd just grab what I needed in the way of attention and education. That was not the kind of environment I needed, but I wasn't about to let that stop me from getting what I could out of it. And it prepares me well for being the only female-bodied person on a panel, if the men try to sideline me by turning the panel into a football game.

As a moderator I try to keep things more balanced. I'm not great yet, but I do pretty well and I'm always honing those skills.

glitteringlynx

12 years ago

ysabetwordsmith

12 years ago

I tend - in both Pagan and SF settings - to do the 'hover at the edge in line of sight'. If the conversation seems private, intense, or specifically focused, I go away as soon as that's clear.

If it isn't - and face it, while some conversations in these places are, but probably the majority aren't - then I hover for a couple of minutes (1-3) and see if I can get a quick "Can I catch up with you later" in to the person I want to talk to, or get invited to join in, whichever makes sense.

The one that I think is rude is either not going away when it's clear that there's a focused topic in play (that I'm not obviously directly involved in) or hanging around long periods hoping to be invited in.

Another thing I keep in mind is that there's other fun stuff I could be doing: if now is not the time, I'd rather be doing that, rather than hanging on the edges of something.
So much of what's acceptable is in the details. And the details change from setting to setting and group to group. My sister once forwarded me an essay about stuff like eye contact and conversational distance, and how different the author found those things at SF conventions and around non SF fans. If I can find it, and find an active link to it, I'll post the link.

If you can read body language at all, one good thing to keep in mind is that if what you're doing is making the person you want to talk to uncomfortable, do something different. Some possibilities are to look away from their eyes--or if you have been avoiding doing so, look in their eyes. Lower your voice, or raise it if they seem to be straining to hear you.

If you've been talking more than they have, pay attention to the pauses between sentences--they may assume a longer time in their heads to know when you're done and it's their turn to talk than you do, and may just be waiting politely until they're sure you're done to speak. Step back, or stop stepping back if they keep walking toward you. (If they want you to keep talking more than they are, they'll fill in with a question or something like "um hm?").

If you seem to have achieved a comfortable conversational distance, but there's someone going by who needs space, say "excuse me" when you move--you don't have to say who you want to excuse you, it just calls attention to the fact that you're moving situationally, not trying to invade their space.

That's what comes to mind at the moment.

But this is a difficult question to address, especially when in a setting like a convention where people have lots of different backgrounds.
... for sharing. These are all insightful points!

If you're aware of conversational distance, you can quietly make yourself more popular by parking your toes and letting other people orient on you to their comfort. This is a casual courtesy in general company, but in heavily cross-cultural group you may be the only person who knows to do it. And what happens when people don't know it is that the people who want a close distance chase the longer-distance people around the room, making nobody happy. When spacing has a conscious as well as a subconscious aspect, it's a lot more possible to keep the stress low.

On an energy level: A lot of people orient on auras without realizing that's what they're doing. If someone crowds close to you and stops at a distance that's nearer than you'd prefer, a likely cause is they're used to that closer distance. Tuck your energy in a little nearer -- but if that makes them start inching closer, put it back. Some people feel shut out if their aura isn't touching yours. Conversely if someone is hanging way back and you feel like you can't reach them, fluff your energy out a little wider. You can usually get it closer to your comfort zone before they start scooting away from you, at which point you should stop.

Similarly if you know whether someone tends to close in to energy (or body) contact range, and you want them to move closer, contracting yourself can reel them in. If you know they prefer to avoid contact and you want to shoo them back a ways, unfold and claim more space; they'll usually retreat.
Pretty much this. I will get in line of sight so that a bit of eye contact is made and then politely stand just to the side. I've done this at every con or meeting I've been to and it's resulted in some incredable discussions with writers, artists, actors, etc.

It's all in how you read body language, voice tone and such and for me, that's as important as the words actually being said.
Ah, the eye contact is an important part.
Any way is better than the way I met author Dave Duncan. We collided at full speed on a staircase at a Con & fell over. His papers went everwhere, my books went everwhere, incl. my copy of his latest book at the time. We laughed, helped each other up, talked for a few minutes & he autographed my book. =)
Yeah, that takes the cake!

Re: Wow!

wiredwizard

12 years ago

I'm very much more comfortable with the stand to one side and wait to be acknowledged method. That doesn't mean I can't do the other.

This approach does not work so well online where the only way to make others aware that you are in fact there and interested is to make some sort of unsolicited contribution. I've had to work hard to overcome my usual reticence in this area. BTW - you've done a good job of making your blog an unthreatening space in which to do so. Questions and invitations to contribute like the ones in this post help. Thank you.

PS - Did you see the final version of Kaikoura? It's up here.
For online approaches: I often make an "introduction" post when I join a new community. When I friend someone, I usually put "New Friend" as the subject line for my first reply to something on their LJ; I try to say something on-topic and may mention how I found them. I'll join topical discussions readily.

I'm a little more cautious about personal stuff, because sometimes people want advice and input, and other times they really don't -- and they don't always indicate clearly which. So I'm more likely to reply if there's a clear signal like a question or request than if there's not.

That's one reason my blog is framed the way it is: I like audience participation, and my favorite blogs are ones with a lively audience. I've observed that direct questions and requests are an effective means of inviting participation, so I work those in where they seem to fit. The networking -- pointing to cook posts on other people's blogs -- and the periodic "what do you want to see more of?" queries are other facets of my process. My aim is to create an inviting space; I'm pleased with it, and I'm glad it's working for you too.

I just looked at the final image. SQUEE! I love it! Thanks everso for sharing. I've linked it in a separate post on my blog, copied that over on crowdfunding, and added a link to the original sponsor post so people reading the poem there will know it's been postered.
I was taught, in martial arts circles, that this is the proper way to get attention of the teacher or someone of higher rank than you. As I did this very thing, I learned that this was the proper and respectful way of doing it; I observed others NOT doing this, and they got summarily ignored.

So. This is somewhat ingrained into me.

If this makes one uncomfortable, or you're waiting a long time, then it is up to the one waiting to find an appropriate place to inject themselves into the existing conversation without disrupting things too much.
Ayup, now that you mention it, I've seen martial arts folks do this. *chuckle* And they tend to center when they do it, which definitely attracts my attention. (Changes in energy-state usually do, as much magical teaching as I do.) So that works.

Huh ... that reminds me, I ought to ask a friend of ours to bring her staff to the Lammas gather. She showed us a few of her staff moves at Litha, but it was dark then and we want to see them again in daylight. 'Cause wow.

anamacha

12 years ago

ysabetwordsmith

12 years ago

Wow

Anonymous

12 years ago

Re: Wow

ysabetwordsmith

12 years ago

As for approaching a conversation, I usually go for the "stand politely to one side" method aforementioned above. This is especially useful in more formal situations, or when I have something important I need to discuss that is not related to the conversation at hand. Less frequently I will go in for the active method and jump in by injecting a comment or question, especially if I am interested in the subject at hand and do not have any discussion topics of my own to offer. Flat-out interruptions are rare, and I only do it when a) it's urgent/important, b) an important point has been left out of the discussion, and it will not get aired unless I butt in to do it, or c) I'm really, really mad and have decided that you well and truly deserve to be hung out to dry (thankfully that almost never happens).

Now this goes slightly off topic, but for the conversations themselves, I usually try to listen more than talk and wait until I'm sure someone's done before speaking myself. If I accidentally interrupt I won't stop speaking right away, but I have gotten pretty good about noticing, apologizing, and inviting the other speaker to finish what they were saying once I have spoken my bit (which I try to keep short in such a case). This method has two main advantages. The first is I don't have to talk about myself so much, which usually feels like bragging. The other is that I learn a lot more about the other person than I would if I just blathered on the whole time. They usually end up liking me better too, since nearly everybody likes to talk about themselves given half a chance.

  • Fieldhaven as Habitat

    If you follow my posts on gardening, birdfeeding, and photos, then you know that I garden for wildlife. Looking at the YardMap parameters, here…

  • A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap

    Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…

  • Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21

    Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…