However, this part caught my eye:
"When you cut in on someone, you don't stand in their line of sight and wait for them to decide to give you their attention. That's obnoxious and you're sending a signal you don't want to send."
One of my favorite con memories is of a Very Famous Author doing exactly that to me. It turns out that I'd done something earlier that impressed him enough that he tracked me down to talk with me. He found me deep in conversation (on the same topic, even) with a couple other people -- and he discreetly parked himself at the edge of my awareness and waited for me to notice him. I invited him into the conversation. This worked. I found the approach charming.
I've done it myself, and it works for me too, in the right context. You have to get the body language and the distance right: close enough to notice, but not crowding; patient rather than over-eager. It's more elegant and dignified than just butting in; and it's a recognized maneuver in academic and intellectual circles. It doesn't work in conversational football, where the accepted entrance maneuver is to spot the ball and tackle someone for it. (I can do that too. I'm also not averse to verbal hockey and am entirely capable of hitting someone in the nuts with the puck.) But I like the flow of conversational dance.
So I'm curious:
What method(s) do you prefer to use for entering a conversation that interests you?
What approach(es) do you like other people to use when they want to join a conversation with you?
July 15 2008, 16:57:36 UTC 12 years ago
July 15 2008, 17:17:42 UTC 12 years ago
Frex, the distance is crucial. If you're too far back, you won't be noticed. If you're too far forward, you're stepping on people's space the wrong way, and it's irritating. You want to just nudge the edge of their awareness.
Also from an energy perspective, different approaches vary a lot. You need a rounded energy for this approach. To cut in, you need a wedge; to tackle the verbal football, you have to sort of shove in and jump on top of someone.
July 15 2008, 17:03:12 UTC 12 years ago
I have to agree with you though. I tend to think it's more polite to show patience in engaging someone in conversation.
July 15 2008, 17:40:49 UTC 12 years ago
July 15 2008, 17:39:44 UTC 12 years ago
If I'm not sure if my input would be welcome (or if I'm feeling shy) I would probably do the same, only I would start off by saying "If you don't mind my saying..."
July 15 2008, 17:50:05 UTC 12 years ago
I learned these maneuvers in school, where boys get called on far more than girls. I'd give the teacher an opportunity to be fair, and if fairness wasn't forthcoming, I'd just grab what I needed in the way of attention and education. That was not the kind of environment I needed, but I wasn't about to let that stop me from getting what I could out of it. And it prepares me well for being the only female-bodied person on a panel, if the men try to sideline me by turning the panel into a football game.
As a moderator I try to keep things more balanced. I'm not great yet, but I do pretty well and I'm always honing those skills.
12 years ago
12 years ago
July 15 2008, 17:43:11 UTC 12 years ago
If it isn't - and face it, while some conversations in these places are, but probably the majority aren't - then I hover for a couple of minutes (1-3) and see if I can get a quick "Can I catch up with you later" in to the person I want to talk to, or get invited to join in, whichever makes sense.
The one that I think is rude is either not going away when it's clear that there's a focused topic in play (that I'm not obviously directly involved in) or hanging around long periods hoping to be invited in.
Another thing I keep in mind is that there's other fun stuff I could be doing: if now is not the time, I'd rather be doing that, rather than hanging on the edges of something.
July 15 2008, 18:25:20 UTC 12 years ago
If you can read body language at all, one good thing to keep in mind is that if what you're doing is making the person you want to talk to uncomfortable, do something different. Some possibilities are to look away from their eyes--or if you have been avoiding doing so, look in their eyes. Lower your voice, or raise it if they seem to be straining to hear you.
If you've been talking more than they have, pay attention to the pauses between sentences--they may assume a longer time in their heads to know when you're done and it's their turn to talk than you do, and may just be waiting politely until they're sure you're done to speak. Step back, or stop stepping back if they keep walking toward you. (If they want you to keep talking more than they are, they'll fill in with a question or something like "um hm?").
If you seem to have achieved a comfortable conversational distance, but there's someone going by who needs space, say "excuse me" when you move--you don't have to say who you want to excuse you, it just calls attention to the fact that you're moving situationally, not trying to invade their space.
That's what comes to mind at the moment.
But this is a difficult question to address, especially when in a setting like a convention where people have lots of different backgrounds.
Thank you...
July 15 2008, 21:31:40 UTC 12 years ago
If you're aware of conversational distance, you can quietly make yourself more popular by parking your toes and letting other people orient on you to their comfort. This is a casual courtesy in general company, but in heavily cross-cultural group you may be the only person who knows to do it. And what happens when people don't know it is that the people who want a close distance chase the longer-distance people around the room, making nobody happy. When spacing has a conscious as well as a subconscious aspect, it's a lot more possible to keep the stress low.
On an energy level: A lot of people orient on auras without realizing that's what they're doing. If someone crowds close to you and stops at a distance that's nearer than you'd prefer, a likely cause is they're used to that closer distance. Tuck your energy in a little nearer -- but if that makes them start inching closer, put it back. Some people feel shut out if their aura isn't touching yours. Conversely if someone is hanging way back and you feel like you can't reach them, fluff your energy out a little wider. You can usually get it closer to your comfort zone before they start scooting away from you, at which point you should stop.
Similarly if you know whether someone tends to close in to energy (or body) contact range, and you want them to move closer, contracting yourself can reel them in. If you know they prefer to avoid contact and you want to shoo them back a ways, unfold and claim more space; they'll usually retreat.
Re: Thank you...
12 years ago
Re: Thank you...
12 years ago
July 15 2008, 19:00:15 UTC 12 years ago
It's all in how you read body language, voice tone and such and for me, that's as important as the words actually being said.
July 15 2008, 21:20:05 UTC 12 years ago
July 15 2008, 20:26:56 UTC 12 years ago
Wow!
July 15 2008, 21:19:17 UTC 12 years ago
Re: Wow!
12 years ago
July 15 2008, 21:56:49 UTC 12 years ago
This approach does not work so well online where the only way to make others aware that you are in fact there and interested is to make some sort of unsolicited contribution. I've had to work hard to overcome my usual reticence in this area. BTW - you've done a good job of making your blog an unthreatening space in which to do so. Questions and invitations to contribute like the ones in this post help. Thank you.
PS - Did you see the final version of Kaikoura? It's up here.
Thoughts
July 15 2008, 22:25:04 UTC 12 years ago
I'm a little more cautious about personal stuff, because sometimes people want advice and input, and other times they really don't -- and they don't always indicate clearly which. So I'm more likely to reply if there's a clear signal like a question or request than if there's not.
That's one reason my blog is framed the way it is: I like audience participation, and my favorite blogs are ones with a lively audience. I've observed that direct questions and requests are an effective means of inviting participation, so I work those in where they seem to fit. The networking -- pointing to cook posts on other people's blogs -- and the periodic "what do you want to see more of?" queries are other facets of my process. My aim is to create an inviting space; I'm pleased with it, and I'm glad it's working for you too.
I just looked at the final image. SQUEE! I love it! Thanks everso for sharing. I've linked it in a separate post on my blog, copied that over on
July 16 2008, 00:37:13 UTC 12 years ago
So. This is somewhat ingrained into me.
If this makes one uncomfortable, or you're waiting a long time, then it is up to the one waiting to find an appropriate place to inject themselves into the existing conversation without disrupting things too much.
July 16 2008, 00:41:15 UTC 12 years ago
Huh ... that reminds me, I ought to ask a friend of ours to bring her staff to the Lammas gather. She showed us a few of her staff moves at Litha, but it was dark then and we want to see them again in daylight. 'Cause wow.
12 years ago
12 years ago
Wow
Anonymous
12 years ago
Re: Wow
12 years ago
okay, now on to the topic
Anonymous
July 16 2008, 04:05:00 UTC 12 years ago
Now this goes slightly off topic, but for the conversations themselves, I usually try to listen more than talk and wait until I'm sure someone's done before speaking myself. If I accidentally interrupt I won't stop speaking right away, but I have gotten pretty good about noticing, apologizing, and inviting the other speaker to finish what they were saying once I have spoken my bit (which I try to keep short in such a case). This method has two main advantages. The first is I don't have to talk about myself so much, which usually feels like bragging. The other is that I learn a lot more about the other person than I would if I just blathered on the whole time. They usually end up liking me better too, since nearly everybody likes to talk about themselves given half a chance.