An ace-friendly deconstruction of the more obnoxious lines in the interview is online. This one really caught my attention:
“Moffat is not saying that Sherlock, like Austin Powers, misplaced his mojo. ‘It’s the choice of a monk, not the choice of an asexual. If he was asexual, there would be no tension in that, no fun in that – it’s someone who abstains who’s interesting. There’s no guarantee that he’ll stay that way in the end – maybe he marries Mrs Hudson. I don’t know!’”
Is sex really the ONLY thing some people can rate as interesting? What is this, high school? Let's leave room for some variety in storytelling. No matter how much popular a given motif is, a steady supply gets boring and people want something else. We really need more positive portrayals of the full range of human sexuality, including asexuality; and while we're at it, also more nonsexual intimacies. Mix it up. And do your research.
I am suddenly extra glad that I have a fishbowl coming up that features Hart's Farm, a setting with two asexual characters, lots of other sexualities, and a penchant for showing affection outside of sex. I'm tired of dysfunctional families, uncommunicative relationships, and characters whose people skills all suck. We do not need any more of this kind of thinking. Stab it with pencils and beat it to death with merry bundles of cash. Meanwhile -- The Odd Trio and Path of the Paladins also feature some asexual characters, available on the Serial Poetry page.
I haven't seen season 2 of Sherlock yet. I loved season 1. I do plan to watch season 2 when I have the chance, but I have mixed feelings about it given what I've heard so far. Perhaps if I throw my expectations down the basement stairs before watching, I'll be pleasantly surprised.
June 16 2012, 04:13:32 UTC 9 years ago
June 16 2012, 04:14:54 UTC 9 years ago
Yes...
9 years ago
9 years ago
Thank you!
9 years ago
Re: Yes...
9 years ago
Re: Yes...
9 years ago
9 years ago
9 years ago
Thoughts
9 years ago
Well...
9 years ago
Re: Well...
9 years ago
Re: Well...
9 years ago
June 16 2012, 06:02:00 UTC 9 years ago
*laugh*
June 16 2012, 06:06:53 UTC 9 years ago
Deleted comment
*sigh*
June 16 2012, 17:35:01 UTC 9 years ago
June 17 2012, 02:52:22 UTC 9 years ago
Thoughts
June 17 2012, 03:49:40 UTC 9 years ago
Well, yes. Though to be fair, many asexuals find sexual stuff boring.
>>I can think of at least one scenario in which Sherlock being a romantic asexual would be MORE interesting. Imagine he fell in love with someone who was sexual. If he was just "abstaining", he could just decide to have sex--problem solved. But if he doesn't like or want sex, that creates an issue that needs to be dealt with.<<
That does seem to be a common experience, mainly for romantic asexuals, but sometimes even the aromantic folks find someone they really like ... who wants to have sex, which is awkward. Which is a story.
>> Which of those two scenarios sounds more interesting to you? <<
Both as a writer and a reader, I tend to be attracted to stories that haven't already been done to death. Finding something new to say about sexual relationships is hard, because it's an overwhelmingly popular topic. But asexual relationships, sheesh, people haven't even finished naming the kinds yet, let alone mapped out the common and uncommon variations. There's a lot of potential to get in there and tell NEW stories ... to an audience that wants something other than two bodies humping on a bed and is therefore bored and annoyed with a majority of mainstream media. So it's a low-competition as well as high-potential field. Writer candy. That's one reason I've been writing more about asexual characters recently, though I've had some all along.
June 17 2012, 02:53:46 UTC 9 years ago
Aaaargh. I've long had a problem with Steven Moffat's sexism and his various attitudes towards non-normative sexuality (don't get me started on his recent spate of offensive tweets about bisexuality), so the only thing that really surprises me about his offensive comment here is that it took him so long to actually to say something like this. D:
The idea that asexual people can't generate conflict or tension or hell, even sexual tension (if they're libidoist asexual, for example, or simply an ace person who has sex because they enjoy sensations of physical arousal sans sexual attraction) is just ignorant and harmful and perpetuates this idea that ace people deserve to be othered or invisibilised in the media.
Angry-making, that's for sure. D: Steven Moffat has this habit of appearing to go two steps forward and then a short time later taking three steps back. His attitudes towards women overall are pretty shitty too, imho. He's said some truly dreadful crap about women, including the *wonderful*:
“I don’t know how well women come out of Coupling,” says Moffat, the son of a headmaster, who taught English in Greenock before following his original writerly instincts and scoring his first success with Press Gang. “There’s this issue you’re not allowed to discuss: that women are needy. Men can go for longer, more happily, without women. That’s the truth. We don’t, as little boys, play at being married - we try to avoid it for as long as possible. Meanwhile women are out there hunting for husbands.”
So... yeah. I can enjoy Moffat's storytelling and scripting. But as a man, I mostly think he's a bit of a privileged dick.
Thoughts
June 17 2012, 03:35:03 UTC 9 years ago
Now you've got me wondering. And tapping my cluehammer against my palm.
>>The idea that asexual people can't generate conflict or tension or hell, even sexual tension (if they're libidoist asexual, for example, or simply an ace person who has sex because they enjoy sensations of physical arousal sans sexual attraction) is just ignorant and harmful and perpetuates this idea that ace people deserve to be othered or invisibilised in the media.<<
Yeah, two minutes on any asexual forum or blog will turn up a whole bunch of situations where aces encounter conflict and/or sexual tension. There really needs to be an article on this, listing common experiences and conflicts, though I don't know if I'm the best person to write it.
>> Men can go for longer, more happily, without women. <<
*blink* That is the opposite of what I have observed. Men tend to really want sex. Women may or may not enjoy it (perhaps because not all men know what to do with a clitoris) and crave it. A good description I've found is that men use relationships to get sex, while women use sex to get relationships. Though none of that is absolute.
Re: Thoughts
9 years ago
Re: Thoughts
9 years ago
9 years ago
Yes...
9 years ago
June 17 2012, 09:29:55 UTC 9 years ago
Yes...
June 17 2012, 17:33:33 UTC 9 years ago
... and doesn't know much about asexuality or asexual people, because it only takes a glance to find the conversations about life challenges due to sexual disinterest.
June 18 2012, 01:28:38 UTC 9 years ago
Yes...
June 18 2012, 01:42:34 UTC 9 years ago
9 years ago
9 years ago
9 years ago
Well...
9 years ago
Re: Well...
9 years ago
Re: Well...
9 years ago
Re: Well...
9 years ago
Re: Well...
9 years ago
June 19 2012, 03:27:21 UTC 9 years ago
Is sex really the ONLY thing some people can rate as interesting? What is this, high school?
Hear, hear. Moffat makes a decent point that stories and characters need tension, but his point falls apart at the assumption that only abstaining from sex to concentrate on work creates tension. Being asexual in a world that 1) doesn't think you exist and 2) if it does admit you exist, can't start to begin to understand anything about you (QED Steven Moffat) is plenty tension-generating, as Sherlock shows quite well.
Thoughts
June 19 2012, 06:08:30 UTC 9 years ago
One classic set is:
* man against man
* man against nature
* man against himself
There are very many different types of conflict. A story is just what happens when somebody wants something and it isn't within easy reach.
>> Being asexual in a world that 1) doesn't think you exist and 2) if it does admit you exist, can't start to begin to understand anything about you (QED Steven Moffat) is plenty tension-generating, as Sherlock shows quite well.<<
I agree. I loved that initial scene in the diner with John trying to figure out Sherlock's orientation.
June 19 2012, 22:10:38 UTC 9 years ago