Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

Vocabulary of Affection

 [personal profile] verbs_not_nouns has an interesting essay about the term "boyfriend" in asexual relationships.  It's a term that comes with its own baggage.  Some people like that, others don't.

We don't really have a lexicon for asexual relationships yet.  More words would be helpful.  Lifefriend, maybe; a suggestion of permanence and affection that doesn't carry the same assumption of sex.  Squishmate, perhaps; drawing on the asexual term 'squish' for a nonsexual kind of crush.
Tags: gender studies, linguistics, networking, vocabulary
Subscribe

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 10 comments
I think squishmate is completely adorable. :D But then, being in online fandom, I've gotten used to using "squish" as a term of affection (though I'd never realized it was an asexual thing, or used in the context of asexual relationships -- mostly I know it in a platonic sense).
>>I think squishmate is completely adorable. :D <<

Thank you! Use as desired.

>>But then, being in online fandom, I've gotten used to using "squish" as a term of affection (though I'd never realized it was an asexual thing, or used in the context of asexual relationships -- mostly I know it in a platonic sense).<<

It is platonic, in the sense of being nonsexual but significant. I'm not sure if the term "squish" for a nonsexual crush was invented by/for asexuals and spread from there, or if they picked it up from somewhere else.
Squishmate is, indeed an adorable word. :D I also like the concept that it describes; I'm not asexual, but I definitely see the appeal of an intimate nonsexual relationship that's not quite familial, but not necessarily romantic.
Hmm ... I had thought that platonic might be slightly offensive in this context, or at least inaccurate, because to me it implies friendship but not mateship.
Well, the core of "platonic" has to do with a clarity of ideal. In the specific context, "platonic love" is a strong, nonsexual love often touched with a spiritual aspect. I don't think that implies an absence of mateship.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platonic_love

Huh, that reminds me of the old custom of courtly love, which was all about the romance and not about physical consummation. Perhaps romantic asexuals could find useful ideas and terms in that -- there was quite a lot written about it, as it was very popular for a long time.
What an interesting essay. And I actually kind of like 'lifefriend' - had never thought of that one before!
I think "lifefriend" suits the platonic rendition of Sherlock Holmes and John Watson, for instance.
Oh, definitely. That's a very good label for them.
I like "lifefriend", personally. "Squishmate" is too cutesy for my tastes.

On one hand, casual acceptance of asexual partnerships might be easier with words that are more - I don't want to say "mainstream" but common. On the other, people ought to be able to define their words for themselves. So I don't know. "Lifefriend" seems more self-explanatory, where "squishmate" is a very inner-circle term that would have to be defined nearly every time it's used.

I'm not ace myself but I do have a "platonic romance" with one of my friends, and I know how hard it can be to define and describe to other people. I've settled on "sworn-brother" because, well, that's about as close as it gets.
My students use "bro" or "cuz" a great deal to explain close relationships.

I also hear "my main man" or "blood friend".