Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

Lost Taxidermy

 It makes me sad and angry when museums neglect their collections.  I feel that institutions have a responsibility to the past, present, and future through the artifacts they hold.  If they are unwilling or unable to take good care of a collection, they should hand it off to someone else.
Tags: history, nature, news
Subscribe

  • Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21

    Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…

  • Bingo

    I have made bingo down the B, G, and O columns of my 6-1-21 card for the Cottoncandy Bingo fest. I also have one extra fill. B1 (caretaking) --…

  • Poetry Fishbowl on Tuesday, July 6

    This is an advance announcement for the Tuesday, July 6, 2021 Poetry Fishbowl. This time the theme will be "Reality is stranger than fiction." I'll…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 6 comments
In Lumpy's case, I'd say he might be past the point of no return. Considering how old Lumpy must be, the pelt is probably so brittle that it might just fall apart into dust and bits of fur just by being moved.
I wonder how old Lumpy is? A century?
I agree with you that this is simply WRONG and should NOT be allowed to happen.
:(


That's a call for an expert in preservation and restoration. Based on what I know of such things, however, I'd consider options like enclosure in a nonreactive atmosphere such as argon; that works for some types of item. While unreasonable for a whole collection, exceptional measures are justified for preserving irreplaceable items such as samples of extinct species.
Now the Argon atmosphere thing might just work. At least I think it might keep the pelt from decaying any worse.
:]
While some situations of this nature are surely due to negligence, I bet you most of them are due to museums not having the funding they need to take care of what they have. Keep in mind that the objects, art, and artifacts on display are a tiny fraction of what they own.
That is true. This does not make it acceptable.
But, most museums are underfunded. The question of turning over collections then becomes "but to whom?" and at some point, can neglected, underfunded, decaying collections still grab people and fire their imaginations because they're still available?