Scientists have agreed on names for three new elements. Pity they didn't consult a linguist; some languages just do not join smoothly. Ah well. I'm still amused that this crossed my desk while I'm working on the atomic combinations for nether-Earth.
-
Poem: "Who Can Create the Future"
This poem is spillover from the May 4, 2021 Poetry Fishbowl. It was inspired by prompts from chanter1944, technoshaman, and Anonymous. It…
-
Setting and content notes for "Escape a Thousand Memories"
These are the setting and content notes for " Escape a Thousand Memories." "Refugees didn’t just escape a place. They had to…
-
Poem: "Escape a Thousand Memories"
This poem is spillover from the May 4, 2021 Poetry Fishbowl. It was inspired by prompts from chanter1944, technoshaman, and Anonymous. It…
-
Poem: "Who Can Create the Future"
This poem is spillover from the May 4, 2021 Poetry Fishbowl. It was inspired by prompts from chanter1944, technoshaman, and Anonymous. It…
-
Setting and content notes for "Escape a Thousand Memories"
These are the setting and content notes for " Escape a Thousand Memories." "Refugees didn’t just escape a place. They had to…
-
Poem: "Escape a Thousand Memories"
This poem is spillover from the May 4, 2021 Poetry Fishbowl. It was inspired by prompts from chanter1944, technoshaman, and Anonymous. It…
Re: Semantics or Stubborness?
November 8 2011, 19:54:17 UTC 9 years ago
Personally, I think someone needs to develop a working theory of element stability, because not all heavy elements can be easily constructed in a stable configuration, even the ones scientists think will be stable.
Re: Semantics or Stubborness?
November 9 2011, 06:35:00 UTC 9 years ago
That would be a useful theory, yes.
In nether-Earth, the elements are stable but not all of their combinations are; some break down very quickly. It makes things ... interesting.