Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

Women in a Post-Apocalypse

Here's an interesting essay about the portrayal of female characters in post-apocalyptic scenarios.

This is, um, mind-blowingly narrow-minded.  Yes, it's a common scenario.  It is by no means universal.  Warrior women are another common PA trope, and there's matriarchal PA fiction if you know where to look.  Plus some oddball examples like Sarah Connor, who is kind of pre-post-apocalyptic and trains her son to survive the apocalypse before it happens.  

Then too, I'm writing in a post-apocalyptic setting, Torn World.  Its various remnants had a lot of different ways of dealing with population pressures shortly after the Upheaval.  Some places needed to push population up, while others needed to limit it.  In the current period, the Southern Empire has rebuilt a thriving society and they have quite good birth control, and citizens are required to practice reproductive responsibility.  The Northerners don't have that kind of birth control, and they are trying to keep their population up which is a challenge in their situation.  Childbearing is expected and respected, but still voluntary.  They've made some serious social adaptations to solve problems in ways that are least stressful; for instance, they practice serial monogamy rather than permanent marriages, and they have raisers to care for children so that people unsuited to parenthood can reproduce then return to their real work.  

Seriously, if people make a post-apocalypic setting suck more than is absolutely necessary, it's just another case of humanity being stupid.  There are saner ways to do things, and some people have used them.  I will say, if you're planning to write post-apocalyptic fiction, do yourself a favor and read some anthropology books.  It's a lot more fun to write about societies that find unusual solutions, rather than Yet Another Broodmare Fic or Five Millionth Story About Testosterone Poisoning.


Tags: gender studies, networking, reading, science fiction, writing
Subscribe

  • A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap

    Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…

  • Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21

    Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…

  • Bingo

    I have made bingo down the B, G, and O columns of my 6-1-21 card for the Cottoncandy Bingo fest. I also have one extra fill. B1 (caretaking) --…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 17 comments

siliconshaman

August 25 2011, 08:52:41 UTC 9 years ago Edited:  August 25 2011, 12:38:59 UTC

I will point out here a single fact that makes a mockery of all the 'protect the females' sexist scenarios... the radiation dosage needed to damage and/or sterilise sperm is about 10, to 20 times lower than the dosage need to do the same thing to eggs.

Putting it simply, sperm are little packages of DNA with no ability to self-repair, unlike eggs, and a male's testicles are rather more exposed than ovaries.

To be blunt, after any nuclear war, there's going to be a lot more infertile men than women. In point of fact, in virtually any apocalyptic scenario that does genetic damage and/or cellular stress, [disease, environmental stress, anything that involves lots of running and poor diet etc.] men's reproductive health generally fares worse than women's, simply because it's evolved to be throw-away... the species as a whole doesn't need that many men to survive.

So, essentially the reality is that post-apocalypse, there'd probably be more women then men, and far more fertile women than men. It's pretty much a given that the women would be doing the rebuilding, at least in terms of numbers.

But as you say, people make post-apocalyptic scenarios suck worse. I can see some group of alpha-male types taking that as license to have a harem.
A lot depends on the degree to which radiation is a long-term problem after a nuclear war. It would obviously be a problem in the countries actually involved in the war, and those directly downwind of them (which would suffer primary fallout and whose populations would thus be injured by it in the month or so right after the war), but it would be less of a problem in countries which were affected only be secondary (stratospheric) fallout. L. Sprague de Camp was right, I think, in his Viagens Interplanetaris universe -- if a nuclear war was fought mostly in the Northern Hemisphere, some large neutral Southern Hemisphere nation (most probably South American) would dominate the postwar global culture.
As some of my characters have observed, "A man needs a woman for nine months. A woman needs a man for nine minutes." It's much more difficult for men to handle women as a commodity than for women to do so with men. You only need one stud, although more is desirable for variety. Broodmares, you need a lot more of.

dunmurderin

9 years ago

About that, you might like the take of http://www.amazon.com/Maerlande-Chronicles-Elisabeth-Vonarburg/dp/0888782942 (here sterility is affecting both genders, but if I recall fertile males are way rarer).
I cannot vouch for the English translation, but the original French was stunning.
Sterility (and other reproductive challenges) is a motif appearing in a number of post-apocalyptic settings. I've seen some good examples, and some fairly dumb ones.

In Torn World, some of the cultures have genetic quirks due to historic bottlenecks where the population was very small. The Glifai have a substantial number of "no-gender" people and a tendency toward very sensitive skin. The Duurludirj are almost all blonds, with some redheads, and they have a healthy form of dwarfism through much of the population. The Northerners have a rare, not-so-healthy form of dwarfism and they run to dark hair. And the Northerners also still have a smallish population that requires care to maintain, so they track relationships carefully and encourage people to reproduce diligently.
of course, people in real life make pre-apocalyptic settings suck much more than necessary on a routine basis....
That's why it's not fair to handwave the implications with "It's post-apocalyptic, so it must therefore suck." It's very rare for people to find new mistakes to make. Most of them are ancient history.
The classic cliche weird post-apocalyptic setting had to be all the post-nuclear war worlds of 1980's science fiction movies, in which for some inexplicable reason all luxury arts had collapsed, save for hairdressing.
Point.

Counterpoint: It is actually possible to create elaborate hairdos with almost no technology, and people do that routinely in many cultures. I'm sure Hollywood didn't do that on purpose, but it is plausible.
Human nature is such that, given a large die-off, as soon as the situation improved sufficiently for there to be some hope, we would breed like mad to fill the available space. Note what happened in Europe after the Black Death. The same thing did not happen to American Indians after the Columbian plagues, but that's because the white conquerors followed hard upon the plagues in most cases.

My point being, there's no sane reason to force women to have lots of children. No "force" would be required, and it would be counterproductive to most inheritor culture's other social interests. Especially because a big mostly-empty world makes flight a distinct option available to the dissatisfied.

Things might be worse in an extreme catastrophe, where the survivors all lived in a shelter of some kind for decades. A lot would depend on the sanity of the leadership, in that case.
>>The same thing did not happen to American Indians after the Columbian plagues, but that's because the white conquerors followed hard upon the plagues in most cases.<<

Germ warfare followed by genocide, yes, so the crisis never ended.

>>Especially because a big mostly-empty world makes flight a distinct option available to the dissatisfied.<<

Hence the counterpoint motif of warrior women and matriarchies.
I'm writing a post-apoc and have been thinking on this stuff a lot. No nukes involved though.

However, it is very much a man's world 5 years down the road. Some places have decent equality, the university area for one. Most are pretty much male-dominated. One place has gone all female with males admitted for breeding purposes and no more. In a world where women are trade-goods, and one settlement has decided to live out John Norman's Gor, it seems the only way to stay free. Mobile gangs of (male) outcasts--mostly gay--serve as vigilante police, circuit court judges, circuit riding preachers and traders. Pregnant women are a valuable commodity and bring the gangs a high price.

Just as my romance characters will never hesitate to throw away love for obsession, so too, I believe groups of humans will never hesitate to fuck things up as much as possible.
That sounds like an interesting setting.
Found this through valarltd's reply to my post on DW and I'm glad you found the article interesting!
It certainly has sparked a fascinating conversation on my LJ.

Re: Thank you!

dunmurderin

9 years ago

  • A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap

    Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…

  • Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21

    Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…

  • Bingo

    I have made bingo down the B, G, and O columns of my 6-1-21 card for the Cottoncandy Bingo fest. I also have one extra fill. B1 (caretaking) --…