-
A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap
Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…
-
Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21
Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…
-
Bingo
I have made bingo down the B, G, and O columns of my 6-1-21 card for the Cottoncandy Bingo fest. I also have one extra fill. B1 (caretaking) --…
August 23 2011, 11:16:13 UTC 9 years ago
August 23 2011, 15:11:15 UTC 9 years ago
Combustibility shouldn't be quite as much of a problem, but then, well... yeah. It's all in how you build the darn things.
August 23 2011, 15:22:23 UTC 9 years ago
Hypothetically it's possible to build a reactor fuelled with straight hydrogen and tritium... it wouldn't be energy producing so it would need to be powered by something like geothermal, but it would produce helium-3 as a fusion product.. which then could be used in smaller home fusion reactors that wouldn't need heavy radiation shielding.
I'm not sure how much lithium one would recover from the fusion reactions, but it at least would a stable isotope and could be recycled into power storage systems.... but of course, if you needed more power and assuming the rectors could be made small enough, one could always use that in a car instead. [no idea if it would generate 1.21 gigawatts though.]
August 23 2011, 15:37:36 UTC 9 years ago
*sigh*
August 23 2011, 19:19:25 UTC 9 years ago
Alas, that's the deal-breaker for me regarding much technology: humans often prefer to build cheaply rather than safely. I think fusion has great potential, if done right; but I wouldn't give it my support until I see how people actually do it and what the risks are.
August 24 2011, 22:11:34 UTC 9 years ago