Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith
  • Mood: busy

The Right to Bear Arms ... on Campus

I like the right to bear arms.  I will grudgingly agree that some places, such as bars, are places where guns probably shouldn't be.  This bill proposes allowing guns on college campuses.  I think that's a great idea.  It would make school shootings briefer, because one of the armed students or teachers might manage to take out the shooter.  And it might help discourage rape, too.
Tags: education, news, politics
Subscribe

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    switch
    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
    Help
  • 118 comments
...go 1 level up... Expand
my_partner_doug

Does not follow

my_partner_doug

March 18 2011, 18:16:34 UTC 10 years ago

"More guns = more bullets flying around = more wounded people."

While this statement is probably true unto and of itself, it has little to do with the Idaho bill that was the original topic of this thread. That legislation does not make it easier for college students to acquire legal weaponry, nor does it provide any motivation (that I can see) for students, or anyone else, to run out and purchase firearms. College campuses are *places*, not *people*, and the proposed law simply creates one more *place* where law-abiding gun owners can carry their weapons: it does not follow that there would be "more guns" as a result of allowing for additional legal geography for the guns that already exist.

Not to mention that it would only have taken only one legally-fired bullet by an armed citizen to have stopped any of the crazed campus shooters *before* they'd have killed as many innocents as died. Suppressing fire adds up to fewer bullets, fewer dead, and fewer wounded.
fayanora

Re: Does not follow

fayanora

March 18 2011, 22:05:04 UTC 10 years ago

Only if they know what they're doing.
my_partner_doug

Re: Does not follow

my_partner_doug

March 18 2011, 22:41:08 UTC 10 years ago

Well, given that the state of Idaho won't issue a hidden carry permit to anyone (this is a non-exhaustive, only partial list) under 21, or with a history of mental illness, or a criminal record (which they take 90 days to investigate), or a dishonorable discharge from the military, or who's had an order of protection issued against them, *and* they require anyone applying for such a license to complete a firearms safety and training course, or demonstrate competence by past performance in shooting competitions or prior military service -- I'd say it's a safe bet that anyone in that state with such a permit *does* "know what they're doing."
alex_antonin

Re: Does not follow

alex_antonin

March 18 2011, 22:48:09 UTC 10 years ago

A little tip that should help you: don't try to have an intelligent conversation with a gun nut, it isn't possible. Guns are like a religion to them, it's worse than trying to have an intelligent discussion of religion with a right-wing Christian. Both gun nuts and right wing Xians, all they hear is what they want to hear, and all they can say is excuses.
ysabetwordsmith

No...

ysabetwordsmith

March 18 2011, 23:09:20 UTC 10 years ago

>>A little tip that should help you: don't try to have an intelligent conversation with a gun nut, it isn't possible.<<

This comment, and others like it, are inappropriate on this blog. This is a venue for the discussion of various topics, including controversial ones. Maturity and respect are expected.