Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

Update: 2011 Rose & Bay Awards

The Rose & Bay Awards honor excellence in cyberfunded creativity. If you're new to this project, please visit the 2011 landing page to learn more.

These are our handlers and categories.  Nominations are currently open.

Art: [info]itew Nominate art!
Fiction: [info]eseme Nominate fiction!
Poetry: [info]xjenavivex Nominate poetry!
Webcomic: [info]ysabetwordsmith Nominate webcomics!
Other Project: [info]xjenavivex Nominate others!
Patron: [info]xjenavivex Nominate patrons!

So far we have this many nominations:
Art -- 5
Fiction -- 10
Poetry -- 4
Webcomics -- 7
Other Project -- 5
Patron -- 5

We still need nominations for all categories.  Happily we got a few more for Poetry.  Come on, folks, there are hundreds  of Webcomic and Fiction projects out there.  Creators, make sure your audience members know about your eligibility.  You should also be nominating your patrons in the Patron category ... *poke with sharp stick* remember they put the FUND in crowdfunding.  If you have not yet posted about the Rose and Bay Awards, please help us boost the signal.   

Tags: awards, cyberfunded creativity
Subscribe

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 7 comments
After many repetitions of the calls for nomination, I still don't know what the Rose and Bay awards are, what they are awarded for, who many nominate, or what winning will garner for the winners.

(Although I know what the categories are!)

Is there...OH. I finally clicked on the 2011 landing page link. (I don't know how many potential nominators are going to know the jargon...I know that I've been just skimming the posts and skipping past them. It would be much clearer if the link was labeled, "Click here to learn more about the Rose & Bay Award." --- or something like hat. If your intent is not to get wider awareness, and it's designed for the in-the-know, my apologies for the unwarranted question/suggestoin.)
I made some earlier posts (here and elsewhere) about the nature of the awards and requests for volunteers, etc. The post you read was an update; I didn't think it was necessary to keep repeating information, as long as the link was there. However, it confused you, so it's not as clear as it could be. I'll poke at it a bit and see if I can improve the functionality. Thank you for your feedback.
I might be happy to spread the word, but if it's confusing, and I don't have the clarification, I'm not going to pass it on, y'know?

I looked up the term "landing page", and the definitions I found weren't very complimentary. (I know what you meant to convey, but that's not what I perceived.)
>>I might be happy to spread the word, but if it's confusing, and I don't have the clarification, I'm not going to pass it on, y'know?<<

That's fair. Is the new opening more useful?

>>I looked up the term "landing page", and the definitions I found weren't very complimentary. (I know what you meant to convey, but that's not what I perceived.)<<

Huh ... I hadn't seen the advertising definition before. I picked up the term "landing page" from other crowdfunders, mostly webfic writers. In that context it means "the page with the information, explanations, and project summary." A lot of projects have stuff spread out in different ways, and it helps to have one go-to spot for links and new viewers.
Much, much better.

What do the winners get, just recognition and a signal boost, or something else?

I puzzled out "cyberfunded creativity" but I'd go with "crowdfunded artworks of all sorts" or something...it seems like you're very much aimed at those in the know, otherwise. (It reads as very jargony.) Nothing wrong with having a narrow focus to your intended audience, if that's the case. But if you're aiming for a wider market, to increase awareness of crowdfunding, more generally worded blurb would work better, (IMO/E).

(I know it can be tough if you're simultaneously trying for insider cred and outsider comprehensibility at the same time.)
>>Much, much better.<<

Okay, good.

>>What do the winners get, just recognition and a signal boost, or something else?<<

Basically that, although there is a certificate. No cash prize yet; maybe we'll do that someday.

>>I puzzled out "cyberfunded creativity" but I'd go with "crowdfunded artworks of all sorts" or something...it seems like you're very much aimed at those in the know, otherwise. (It reads as very jargony.) Nothing wrong with having a narrow focus to your intended audience, if that's the case. But if you're aiming for a wider market, to increase awareness of crowdfunding, more generally worded blurb would work better, (IMO/E).

(I know it can be tough if you're simultaneously trying for insider cred and outsider comprehensibility at the same time.)<<

Writing here, in my own journal, most folks already know what "cyberfunded creativity" or "crowdfunding" is because I post about that all the time. There's always the landing page link for more detail. If I'm promoting the award in crowdfunding then again, that's an audience already familiar with the topics. When writing elsewhere, and addressing an audience I assume to be unfamiliar with the award and with cyberfunded creativity, then I'll take a different approach and give a longer introduction with definitions.

For me it's less about old or new audiences, though, than it is about old or new information. I've been talking about the 2011 Rose & Bay Awards since December, when I made the advance planning posts. If I repeat too much, it's going to annoy the people who've already read that stuff. I have a tendency toward pyramid-writing with the newest, most important information at the top, and other stuff farther down. That's why I usually put "further information" links at the end.
*nod* Mostly for me it's that I've thought recently about signal boosting your notice, and had hesitated because I found it personally confusing. (And hadn't said anything until today, when I had some time.)