Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

Renewable Energy

I was intrigued by the introduction of this article:

The pursuit of sustainability in the 21st century will equate economic growth with ecological improvement, not ecological destruction. The ecosphere is humanity's home, not a temporary hotel that we trash with impunity before moving on. Sustainability means equilibrating human conduct with the health and dynamics of the ecosphere, to maintain conditions favorable for life. Humanity's existence and future depend upon it.
Tags: environment, politics
Subscribe

  • A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap

    Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…

  • Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21

    Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…

  • Goldenrod Gall Contents

    Apparently all kinds of things go on inside goldenrod galls, beyond the caterpillars who make them. Fascinating. I've seen the galls but haven't…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 4 comments
That is a great beginning to a very intriguing article.
Sounds interesting. I can't read the article right now, but I'll read it when I get home.

But, in general, I find the idea that there is a conflict between economic growth and environmental protection short-sighted. The only conflict is the one that always exists between short-term gain and long-term good. No one would say there's a conflict between, say, developing and maintaining infrastructure an profit. It may reduce short-term profit to build up a strong infrastructure, but in the long run, it creates greater profits. The environment seems, to me, much the same way. Sure, we may get more profits *now* if we exploit the environment to the utmost, but our grandchildren will be a lot poorer for it.
The economy is not in competition with the environment. The economy is a subset of the environment. So is everything else on Earth. If the environment crashes, the economy -- not to mention humanity in general -- has nowhere else to go.
*nods* Yet, it's often claimed that environmental protection is hostile to economic growth.