Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

America's Deepening Moral Crisis

I was intrigued by this article, though it offers little in the way of solutions and I'm not particularly a fan of huge taxes either. 

I believe that each society has an obligation to care for its members, equal to the obligation of members to contribute to society.  You don't get to grab the goodies and just walk away.  People must have access to jobs that earn enough to live on.  I'd rather see people take care of each other willingly, effectively, and locally so that folks in need aren't forced to rely on a clunky government or pushy church.  And I think that a fundamental problem today is that people simply don't care about each other anymore -- they're okay with human beings dying of preventable causes.  I'm really not.


America's deepening moral crisis

The language of collective compassion has been abandoned in
the US, and no politician dare even mention helping the poor

By Jeffrey Sachs

President Barack Obama is likely to face difficulty passing
progressive legislation after the November elections.

America's political and economic crisis is set to worsen
following the upcoming November elections. President Barack
Obama will lose any hope for passing progressive legislation
aimed at helping the poor or the environment. Indeed, all
major legislation and reforms are likely to be stalemated
until 2013, following a new presidential election. An already
bad situation marked by deadlock and vitriol is likely to
worsen, and the world should not expect much leadership from
a bitterly divided United States.

Much of America is in a nasty mood and the language of
compassion has more or less been abandoned. Both political
parties serve their rich campaign contributors, while
proclaiming they defend the middle class. Neither party even
mentions the poor - who now officially make up 15% of the
population, but in fact are even more numerous when we count
all those households struggling with healthcare, housing,
jobs and other needs.

The Republican party recently issued a "Pledge to America" to
explain its beliefs and campaign promises. The document is
filled with nonsense, such as the fatuous claim high taxes
and over-regulation explain America's high unemployment. It
is also filled with propaganda. A quote from President John F
Kennedy states that high tax rates can strangle the economy,
but Kennedy was speaking half a century ago, when the top
marginal tax rates were twice what they are today. Most of
all, the Republican platform is devoid of compassion.

America today presents the paradox of a rich country falling
apart because of the collapse of its core values. American
productivity is among the highest in the world. Average
national income per person is about $46,000 - enough not only
to live on, but to prosper. Yet the country is in the throes
of an ugly moral crisis.

Income inequality is at historic highs, but the rich claim
they have no responsibility to the rest of society. They
refuse to come to the aid of the destitute, and defend tax
cuts at every opportunity. Almost everybody complains, almost
everybody aggressively defends their own narrow, short-term
interests, and almost everybody abandons any pretense of
looking ahead or addressing the needs of others.

What passes for American political debate is a contest
between the parties to give bigger promises to the middle
class, mainly in the form of budget-busting tax cuts at a
time when the fiscal deficit is already more than 10% of GDP.
Americans seem to believe that they have a natural right to
government services without paying taxes. In the American
political lexicon, taxes are defined as a denial of liberty.

There was a time, not long ago, when Americans talked of
ending poverty at home and abroad. Lyndon Johnson's "war on
poverty" in the mid 1960s reflected an era of national
optimism and the belief that society should make collective
efforts to solve common problems, such as poverty, pollution
and healthcare. America in the 1960s enacted programs to
rebuild poor communities, to fight air and water pollution,
and to ensure healthcare for the elderly. Then the deep
divisions over Vietnam and civil rights, combined with a
surge of consumerism and advertising, seemed to end an era of
shared sacrifice for the common good.

For 40 years, compassion in politics receded. Ronald Reagan
gained popularity by cutting social benefits for the poor
(claiming the poor cheated to receive extra payments). Bill
Clinton continued those cuts in the 1990's. Today, no
politician even dares to mention help for poor people.

The big campaign contributors to both parties pay to ensure
their vested interests dominate political debates. That means
both parties increasingly defend the interests of the rich,
though Republicans do so slightly more than Democrats. Even a
modest tax increase on the rich is unlikely to find support
in American politics.

The result of all this is likely to be a long-term decline of
US power and prosperity, because Americans no longer invest
collectively in their common future. America will remain a
rich society for a long time to come, but one that is
increasingly divided and unstable. Fear and propaganda may
lead to more US-led international wars, as in the past
decade.

And what is happening in America is likely to be repeated
elsewhere. America is vulnerable to social breakdown because
it is a highly diverse society. Racism and anti-immigrant
sentiments are an important part of the attack on the poor ???
or at least the reason why so many are willing to heed the
propaganda against helping the poor. As other societies
grapple with their own increasing diversity, they may follow
the US into crisis.

Swedes recently gave enough votes to a rightwing, anti-
immigrant party to give it representation in parliament,
reflecting a growing backlash against the rising number of
immigrants in Swedish society. In France, Nicolas Sarkozy's
government has tried to regain popularity with the working
class by deporting Roma migrants, a target of widespread
hatred and ethnic attacks.

Both examples show that Europe, like the US, is vulnerable to
the politics of division, as our societies become more
ethnically diverse.

The lesson from America is that economic growth is no
guarantee of wellbeing or political stability. American
society has become increasingly harsh, where the richest
Americans buy their way to political power and the poor are
abandoned to their fate. In their private lives, Americans
have become addicted to consumerism, which drains their time,
savings, attention and inclination to engage in acts of
collective compassion.

The world should beware. Unless we break the ugly trends of
big money in politics and rampant consumerism, we risk
winning economic productivity at the price of our humanity.

_____________________________________________

Tags: networking, politics
Subscribe

Recent Posts from This Journal

  • Poem: "The Little Shadow Across the Grass"

    This poem is spillover from the April 20, 2021 Bonus Fishbowl. It was inspired by prompts from janetmiles and fuzzyred. It also fills the…

  • Birdfeeding

    Today is sunny and mild. I fed the birds. I've seen house finches and sparrows. I raked the firepit and laid a chimney of sticks in it. We broke up…

  • Community Building Tip: Outdoor Movies

    For my current set of tips, I'm using the list " 101 Small Ways You Can Improve Your City. 79. Screen a movie outdoors. An impromptu movie…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 12 comments
I agree. I think the reason things are as they are is because our sphere of interaction is bigger than our Monkeysphere. http://www.cracked.com/article_14990_what-monkeysphere.html
I like to think that my monkeysphere is larger; but really, I'm just more able to deal with ambiguity. I'm not even sure I know more than 150 people off the top of my head, though I probably recognize about that many faces (and twice as many names, oddly enough, especially if I've seen them as characters or personal aliases in my online interactions). I just don't have as strong an attachment to the people on the fringes of my awareness, so I know less about who they are and what they've done.
I am most concerned about the people closest to me. However, I do not wish for even strangers to live in misery. I wish them to have a place to stay, food to eat, clean water, health care, safety and satisfaction at least to a minimum degree. Because if this is not so, then the world sucks, and that makes me unhappy; plus those people are far more of a threat to me and mine than they would be if their lives were decent. I'd like to be able to stay in a hotel without having to remember that the cleaning staff are probably destroying their health so I can sit on a clean toilet.
Amen to that. The pattern today is "Rich get richer and poor get poorer." Which is sad and stupid, because hasn't anyone noticed that when the poorest among us get richer, everyone above them benefits as well? What do the richest people in 3rd world countries have that compares to what the wealthy of USA have?

I hope USA starts moving to a more European model, SOON.
The only way you can wish that is if you know absolutely nothing about what's going on in Europe right now.

The birthrate in Europe right now is at an average of 1.6 children per woman... except for the Muslim birthrate, which is at something between 3 and 4, a fact which is causing problems of its own though I won't go into them here. European debt levels are far higher than the US's as a percentage of GDP, and European countries are desparately cuttnig budgets and instituting austerity measures in an effort to preserve their nations' finances. These austerity measures are in turn being protested by populations who have become accustomed to not having to look after themselves, which is causing varying degrees of instability in France, Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy, England.

Welfare states are pyramid schemes that depend on expanding populations, and the populations of some of these states are actually decreasing right now. Others' populations are only increasing because of immigration, with the immigrants causing problems of their own by absorbing a disproportionate amount of the welfare funds.
Yes, the number of things America is borrowing from third-world countries is very worrisome. I look at places with the MINE! meme ascendant, and sheesh, crappy roads, dismal health care, government corruption, erratic services, general misery -- and like you said, even the rich aren't doing so well.
That's part of it, but that part has been active for centuries. I think it's why we haven't found a really durable form of government that doesn't start sucking when we add people to it.

I'm concerned by the breakdown of social ties. We went from extended families to nuclear families and now in many cases we're down to single-parent families. Churches used to be very tight-knit supportive communities, and most people belonged to one; that's not nearly as common now. Employment used to be long-term for many people, which made coworkers another social unit; that's getting rarer also. Increased mobility can be great, but it means that fewer people know their neighbors; the neighborhood has declined as a social unit. Online friendships are vital for many folks -- but a friend who lives in another state or country can't jump-start your stalled car, water your plants, or otherwise help with practical tasks. All of these things cost us fault-tolerance, which means that when something goes wrong for one person, it easily cascades to cause trouble for others as well, because there may not be anyone available to stop the slide.

We're also in the process of ditching our social capital. We expect people to support society with taxes and other contributions -- but society isn't doing a very good job of taking care of its members. The education system is diminishing, and high school isn't enough anymore; you need a college degree and those are ruinously expensive. You're not guaranteed a job, but you are blamed for not having one as if this somehow justifies letting you suffer. There are houses standing empty, and people without homes. Health care is an expensive luxury, yet it's something everyone needs, and again it's a place where one person's problems rapidly impact others. Roads, bridges, water systems, levees, and other infrastructure need upkeep but nobody wants to pay for that; they fall apart and sometimes kill people.

Somehow "I've got mine, fuck everybody else" has become an acceptable and prevalent worldview. And this used to be one of the leading countries in the world's fight against poverty, disease, hunger, and tyranny. That's a very frustrating change.
What's ironic is that the true self-serving individual helps others out so they'll reciprocate, and because what helps others helps you. In "Uncle Setnakt's Essential Guide To The Left Hand Path," the writer talks about how followers should eventually become peers so they can help one another achieve greater heights, and talks also about treating mundanes with respect (if they deserve it, and even in some cases when they don't) because what helps others helps one's self, if for no other reason than it helps your reputation. He said it much more eloquently than I did, though.

It's a very good point, too. Too many people are social darwinists, and ironically, I think Darwin would disapprove because while the law of nature is "survival of the fittest," humans' ability to co-operate IS what makes us "fittest." We could not have become what we are without it, and we'll crash and burn if we try to go on without it. So "social darwinism" is, IMHO, a misnomer.
>>What's ironic is that the true self-serving individual helps others out so they'll reciprocate, and because what helps others helps you.<<

Enlightened self-interest, yes.

>>Too many people are social darwinists, and ironically, I think Darwin would disapprove because while the law of nature is "survival of the fittest," humans' ability to co-operate IS what makes us "fittest."<<

What people forget is, that law selects for survivability, not quality. Hit the ecosystem hard enough, and what survives will be along the lines of rats, cockroaches, flies, and jellyfish. That's not the kind of nature most people find appealing. Same with social Darwinism -- it tends to encourage barbaric behavior, because the short-term benefits of that are high. It's good for surviving, say, a war zone or a plague. But it's a crappy strategy for long-term survival, and you can't really build a civilization with it. For that you need cooperation.
Eloquently put.
The irony is that the greedy SOBs of today, the ones that whine the loudest about their taxes being too high, have benefited enormously from the taxes paid by the previous three generations to build the infrastructure that nurtured the American economic powerhouse. Now the whole thing needs maintenance, because they didn't want to do the routine stuff, they were too busy "getting rich", and they don't want to reinvest for the next generation. "Jesus will come" instead, I guess, or "Let those freeloaders (the poor) pay."

They disgust me.
>>The irony is that the greedy SOBs of today, the ones that whine the loudest about their taxes being too high, have benefited enormously from the taxes paid by the previous three generations to build the infrastructure that nurtured the American economic powerhouse.<<

This is true. Meanwhile, there is not much invested in the future. So the under-educated, poorly raised younger generations are the ones who'll be in charge when the currently powerful folks are old and infirm. That is not going to be pretty.

>>Now the whole thing needs maintenance, because they didn't want to do the routine stuff, they were too busy "getting rich", and they don't want to reinvest for the next generation. <<

Yep, that's a problem.

I actually read about one town that had to close a bunch of its firehouses, because they couldn't afford to keep them open. Like a fire is going to say, "Oh, that's a rich neighborhood, I better not spread there!"

Recent Posts from This Journal

  • Poem: "The Little Shadow Across the Grass"

    This poem is spillover from the April 20, 2021 Bonus Fishbowl. It was inspired by prompts from janetmiles and fuzzyred. It also fills the…

  • Birdfeeding

    Today is sunny and mild. I fed the birds. I've seen house finches and sparrows. I raked the firepit and laid a chimney of sticks in it. We broke up…

  • Community Building Tip: Outdoor Movies

    For my current set of tips, I'm using the list " 101 Small Ways You Can Improve Your City. 79. Screen a movie outdoors. An impromptu movie…