I'm disappointed that so many people think they have the One True Way regarding copyright. The concept itself really isn't all that old. It has varied radically over time, and is not universal today across cultures. Different groups of people have different ideas about how intellectual and cultural material should be handled. And that's okay, because laws are really just guidelines that people make up. You have to remember that what people want can change. A lot of the younger folks are handling data differently, not because they're too stupid to understand the older approach, but because they don't like the older approach, they like something else better. If or when their opinion becomes the majority, the culture's stance and the laws will change accordingly. Or maybe someone will think of something else in the meantime, and we'll go in another direction.
Explore. Dream. Think. If you don't like the way things are, imagine something new. Consider the pros and cons of the status quo and compare them to your new idea. And if you disagree with someone else's stance, do so responsibly. Don't act like a jerk. If you want people to respect you, then you need to respect them too, even when you disagree.
August 31 2010, 19:58:35 UTC 10 years ago
But I don't think it would be so bad to do without it. Things would be different, but not a cultural void.
Hmm...
August 31 2010, 21:07:32 UTC 10 years ago
Re: Hmm...
September 1 2010, 01:51:53 UTC 10 years ago
August 31 2010, 22:54:01 UTC 10 years ago
September 5 2010, 01:42:47 UTC 10 years ago
Too true...
September 5 2010, 02:22:23 UTC 10 years ago
I note that the overly sticky fingers of the formal copyright system have created an increasing number and popularity of competing systems. I suspect it may simply be ignored to death rather than legislated away or turned into something actually effective.
August 31 2010, 22:49:26 UTC 10 years ago
Most of the copyright law problems we have NOW have come from hastily enacted laws done in response to public demand. Rather than laws enacted by thoughtful people with a grasp on the reality and an eye to the future.
I would also disagree that laws are just "guidelines" bc that implies that we are free to decide for ourselves if laws are worth following. It's not a guideline to not murder, not steal, not rape people, and we have laws against all those things. Do people still do them - sure. Is that acceptable? No.
Thoughts
September 1 2010, 02:19:39 UTC 10 years ago
We are free to choose whether or not to follow laws. People disobey laws all the time. Often that's a bad idea; for instance, speeding is common, but it's risky behavior. Then there are laws that should not be followed, laws that are downright evil to follow. If people follow blindly, they can get sucked into doing quite ghastly things. The Fugitive Slave Law leaps readily to mind. Laws are important, but in they end they are something that people make up -- the formal expectations that a given society has of its members. They can be changed. They aren't the be-all and end-all of anything.