Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

A Brief "Forever"

This article appalled me for several reasons: 1) It shows the damage that can be done when mineral development is allowed on someone else's private property, against the landowner's wishes. 2) The way they decided to resolve the issue was to seek removal of the conservation easement, instead of trying to get the energy company booted off the land for damaging the conservation usage. 3) It sets an extremely dangerous precedent, in which "forever" in a legal context can mean "until someone feels like changing it."

So many Americans have no grasp of deep time. They aren't even good at planning to the end of their own lifetimes. *fume*
Tags: nature, news
Subscribe

  • A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap

    Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…

  • Winterfest in July Bingo Card 7-1-21

    Here is my card for the Winterfest in July Bingo fest. It runs from July 1-30. Celebrate all the holidays and traditions of winter! ( See all my…

  • Goldenrod Gall Contents

    Apparently all kinds of things go on inside goldenrod galls, beyond the caterpillars who make them. Fascinating. I've seen the galls but haven't…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 2 comments
Well, "forever" is just begging to be violated. You can't possibly expect "forever" to hold (just ask the Indians about "forever" in treaties ...). Still, just a few years after the fact? And whatever happened to the principle that you own everything underneath your land?
a really great novel on this subject is called The Divide by Nicholas Sparks. Just finished it. So very sad.