Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

Tyrannosaurs as Scavengers

Read the fossil evidence of scavenging.

My personal suspicion is that Tyrannosaurs were opportunists that would scavenge or hunt, whichever seemed most favorable at the time.  They're a bit clunky for pure predators, and overbuilt for pure scavengers.

Tags: history, nature, news, science, wildlife
Subscribe

  • A Little Slice of Terramagne: YardMap

    Sadly the main program is dormant, but the YardMap concept is awesome, and many of its informative articles remain. YardMap was a citizen science…

  • Birdfeeding

    Today is sunny, muggy, and warm. I fed the birds. I've seen house finches and a squirrel. After lunch, we moved the rest of the walnut logs. Most…

  • Goldenrod Gall Contents

    Apparently all kinds of things go on inside goldenrod galls, beyond the caterpillars who make them. Fascinating. I've seen the galls but haven't…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 6 comments
I'm with you on that. Some thing on TV once said they were pure scavengers "like hyenas" and I was like, "Um, pardon? Hyenas hunt, too. Hyenas and lions take turns scavenging off each others kills."
I read once that, in fact, hyenas' kill-to-scavange ratio is actually better than lions'.
Figures.

Hyena: "We do more kills than those lazy lions, and who do the humans like? Those lazy lion bastards! Fuck them all! The only reason humans like lions is because they're "prettier." They're "giant kitties." Damned dumb primates. My ancestors should've eaten all their ancestors before they learned how to stand upright... *grumble grumble*"
I'm with Calvin. Tyrannosauruses have to be predators, because it's much cooler that way! ;-)

More seriously, I suspect they probably did favor scavenging, though. Particularly as I've read of studies that indicate that they were probably incapable of running, as, given their height and mass, tripping at a running speed would be fatal. The force they would hit the ground with would crush their skull, and their forelimbs were far too small to stop their fall. And their size would preclude ambush hunting.
I've seen trees big enough to hide a T. rex. Ambush hunting is plausible.
With the energy required to move that mass, scavenging would certainly be a more efficient strategy.

Of course, successful scavenging (as in, being the big bad at the feeding site) would allow for more successful hunting as well, with the extra energy reserves.