Elizabeth Barrette (ysabetwordsmith) wrote,
Elizabeth Barrette
ysabetwordsmith

  • Mood:

The Feminist Fish

I always figured the anglerfish for a feminist species.  This is the first I've heard about the female's ability to collect multiple sets of testicles, however.
Tags: humor, nature, wildlife
Subscribe

Recent Posts from This Journal

  • Community Building Tip: Outdoor Movies

    For my current set of tips, I'm using the list " 101 Small Ways You Can Improve Your City. 79. Screen a movie outdoors. An impromptu movie…

  • Photographs

    I took some pictures of my yard today. Read about what makes a good wildlife yard and Fieldhaven as habitat. The larger brush pile is still…

  • Birdfeeding

    Today is partly sunny and delightfully mild. I fed the birds. I've seen a small flock of house finches and a few sparrows. I walked around the yard…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 6 comments
Gleep! D8
Ah, that was amusing :)
Hmm.
--I'm just nuts about you, Baby!
--You will be.
I really want to see a woman w/ a car she names "The Anglerfish" who then drives around stealing people truck nuts. :p
I'm not sure "feminist" applies to a species where the male is essentially nothing more than a transport unit for testicles ... ^_^

Actually, not all anglerfish exhibit that behavior, only a few families. Although, from what I can tell, all anglerfish *do* have significant sexual dimorphism, with larger females than males. But, in most families, the male remains a separate organism, attaching only during mating.

The fusion part is the oddest aspect. I can see how evolution would produce smaller and smaller males, and even lead to the males attaching themselves to females (once they get small enough, it'd be hard for them to keep up with the much larger female, after all; most of the other families already have males that attach to the female by biting her during mating), but the fusion of the two organisms - its evolution is the big mystery! Once said fusion occurred, then its not surprising that the superfluous tissue (i.e., everything but the testes) would be lost.

Apparently 8 sets is the largest number found so far. I wouldn't be surprised if there's a few females out there with even more.

Although - the question arises whether it's appropriate to call the post-fusion organism a "female", as it functions more like a hermaphrodite, with the quirk of being a chimera, the testes and ovaries being of different genomes. Arguably, one could describe this as two separate, sexed, organisms fusing into a single hermaphroditic organism.
>>Although - the question arises whether it's appropriate to call the post-fusion organism a "female", as it functions more like a hermaphrodite, with the quirk of being a chimera, the testes and ovaries being of different genomes. Arguably, one could describe this as two separate, sexed, organisms fusing into a single hermaphroditic organism.<<

Yes, I think "chimerical hermaphrodite" is probably more apt.